Matrix Linear Systems Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a linear system represented by a matrix equation. A key point is the confusion between calculating A - I (the identity matrix) versus A - 1 (subtracting 1 from each entry). The correct approach leads to the equation (A - I)x = 0, which simplifies to a reduced row echelon form indicating that one variable is arbitrary. The final solution is expressed as x = c(1, 0), where c is any scalar, reflecting the relationship between the variables. Clarification on notation and the interpretation of arbitrary constants is also emphasized.
zack7
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question in the image.

Homework Equations


I got a but can seem to get the answer for b which is $$\vec{x} = c\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$

where for any scalar c

The Attempt at a Solution


I managed to get it to $$\vec{x}(A-1)=0$$

$$= \begin{pmatrix} 0 3 \\ -1 0\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 0 \\ 0 1\end{pmatrix}$$
Then I reduced the matrix to reduced row echolon form
but after that I seem not to get the answer.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • Untitled7.png
    Untitled7.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 472
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
zack7 said:

Homework Statement


Question in the image.


Homework Equations


I got a but can seem to get the answer for b which is $$\vec{x} = c\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$

where for any scalar c

The Attempt at a Solution


I managed to get it to $$\vec{x}(A-1)=0
You made a mistake in how you calculated A - I. (It's not A - 1. IOW, you don't subtract 1 from each entry of A.)
zack7 said:
= \begin{pmatrix} 0 3 \\ -1 0\end{pmatrix}$$=\begin{pmatrix} 1 0 \\ 0 1\end{pmatrix}$$
Then I reduced the matrix to reduced row echolon form
but after that I seem not to get the answer.

Thank you
 
Mark44 said:
You made a mistake in how you calculated A - I. (It's not A - 1. IOW, you don't subtract 1 from each entry of A.)
I get (A-I),
which would then be
$$\begin{pmatrix} 0 3 \\ 0 0\end{pmatrix}$$
but this would mean x1 and x2 = 0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zack7 said:
but if I factorize the x out I get (A-1), how would I simplfy that since it is not possible to subtract?

No, you don't get A - 1. Here's the way it goes:

Ax = x
=> Ax - x = 0
=> (A - I)x = 0

In the last equation, that is A - I, the 2 x 2 identity matrix, NOT the matrix whose entries are all 1's.

Calculate A - I, and row reduce it to find the solution set.
 
Mark44 said:
No, you don't get A - 1. Here's the way it goes:

Ax = x
=> Ax - x = 0
=> (A - I)x = 0

In the last equation, that is A - I, the 2 x 2 identity matrix, NOT the matrix whose entries are all 1's.

Calculate A - I, and row reduce it to find the solution set.

Thanks, I understand that part,careless mistake but when I reduce it I get
x1 and x2 = 0
 
zack7 said:
I get (A-I),
which would then be
\begin{pmatrix} 0 3 \\ 0 0\end{pmatrix}$$
but this would mean x1 and x2 = 0
No. The top row says 0x1 + 3x2 = 0, so x1 is arbitrary.
 
Mark44 said:
No. The top row says 0x1 + 3x2 = 0, so x1 is arbitrary.

then why is the answer $$\vec{x} = c\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$
$$\vec {x} = x1\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fixed your LaTeX. You need to put the [noparse]$$[/noparse] thing at the end of your expression, too.
zack7 said:
then why is the answer $$\vec{x} = c\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$isn't it then $$\vec{x} = x1\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$$
Those are pretty much the same thing. In the first, c is an arbitrary number; in the second, x1 is an arbitrary number.
 
Back
Top