Matrix multiplication to addition

yiorgos
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a transformation that relates a matrix product with a matrix addition, e.g.
AB = PA + QB

Is there any such transformation?
Thnx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the answer would be no, simply because of a dimensional mismatch.
Suppose A is an n x m matrix and B is m x r (the first dimension has to be m otherwise AB does not make sense). Then AB is n x r. However, P will be p x n and Q will be q x m, for some numbers p and s (the second coordinate is fixed because the products will have to make sense). All this only works out if p = q = m = r which restricts the validity of the theorem, if it were true, quite a lot.

Oh, and if you do get the dimensions to work out, there is of course the trivial solution P = 0n x m, Q = A.
 
Thanks for the answer.
You are right about the particular transformation yet that was just a naive example I gave.

I am sure there exist "clever" ways to achieve this.

For example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm_of_a_matrix

I don't know if that helps more but what I actually need is
the below transformation.
AB*u -> f(A)*u + f(B)*u

where u is a vector and f,g() some functions (like the one in the link I gave)
 
Well, a single number can be thought of as a "one by one" matrix so the first thing you should think about is "if A and B are numbers, do there necessarily exist a function f such that ABu= f(A)u+ f(B)u for every number u?"
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, a single number can be thought of as a "one by one" matrix so the first thing you should think about is "if A and B are numbers, do there necessarily exist a function f such that ABu= f(A)u+ f(B)u for every number u?"

So in short you are saying that this transformation doesn't hold?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top