Max Hill Steepness for a Cyclist: Solving the Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndwiseguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Max
AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum steepness of a hill a cyclist can climb, start by calculating the force exerted by the cyclist based on their weight and the efficiency of the bike. The cyclist can exert a force equal to 0.90 times their weight, while the bike's mass adds to the total weight. The gear ratios from the sprockets and the radii of the pedals and wheels will help in calculating the torque and ultimately the force the tires exert on the ground. Ignoring friction simplifies the problem, as bicycles are highly efficient machines. Understanding these principles will lead to solving the steepness problem effectively.
ndwiseguy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Ok now, i know it says that i should show the work I've done on the question. Problem is, I have no idea where to start. So here is the question:

Assume a cyclist of weight w can exert a force on the pedals equal to 0.90w on the average. If the pedals rotate in a circle of radius 18cm, the wheels have radius of 34cm, and the front and back sprockets on which the chain runs have 42 and 19 teeth, respectively, determine the maximum steepness of hill the cyclist can climb. Assume bike mass is 12kg and rider mass is 60 kg. Ignore friction.

If you could tell me where to start that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think you should do? What have you tried?

If you can figure out the force that the tire exerts on the ground, you're almost there.

You could cheat, and claim that w/o friction the bike can't make it up the hill. ;)
 
Last edited:
thank you very much
 
Bicycles are one of the most efficient machines known to humanity, so you can ignore friction as it amounts to be very little. A really good Bike can be ~95% to ~98% efficient (if I recall that one right) so the remaining 2% - 5 % is the friction part.

P.S. rarely will a back sprocket have an odd number of teeth (I've a friend with an eleven though) like 19, (cause it doesn't divide nicely into 360°) and the wheel radius are the wheel sizes in inches. A racing bike has 27 x 1 1/4 tires, so the wheel, when measured with a tape measure, will have a 27 inch diameter, 13.5 inch radius, and cheese, a "12 Kg" bike, WOW, heavy!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top