Maximizing Banked Turn Angle for Runner on Track

  • Thread starter Thread starter mvs1c
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Motion
AI Thread Summary
A runner on a banked turn with a radius of 30 meters and a speed of 10 m/s must consider the coefficient of static friction of 0.71 to determine the maximum banking angle. The equations of motion require balancing the horizontal and vertical components of the normal and friction forces to account for gravity and centripetal acceleration. The initial attempts to calculate the angle overlooked the necessary components of these forces, leading to incorrect results. The correct approach involves a more complex expression for tangent theta that incorporates both horizontal and vertical forces. Understanding these components is crucial for accurately determining the maximum banking angle that prevents slipping.
mvs1c
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A runner is running on the banked turn of a track. The radius of the turn is 30 meters. The speed of the runner is 10 m/s. The coefficient of static friction between the runner's shoes and the track is .71. What is the maximum banking angle that will still allow the runner to run through the turn?

µf : .71
speed of runner : 10 m/s
radius of the turn: 30 m

Choices of answers:
33.7 degrees
23.8
54.1
46.8

Homework Equations



F = m(V^2/R)
Fs-max = µs*Fn
Fn= normal force

The Attempt at a Solution



I haven't had much luck. My professor has covered a few example problems that were similar, but they had negligible friction or a different angle set up.

I did try taking µs*Fn*sinθ = m(-v^2/R) and dividing it by Fncosθ = mg
resulting in tan θ = -V^2*µs/(g*R), which is equivalent to tan θ = -100^2*.71/(30*9.81)
but that resulted in an angle of 13.56 degrees, which isn't even on the answer choices.
I would appreciate any help you can give =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mvs1c said:
I did try taking µs*Fn*sinθ = m(-v^2/R) and dividing it by Fncosθ = mg

the first equation isn't valid because you forgot the horizontal component of the normal force.

the second equation isn't valid because you forgot the vertical component of the friction force.
 
in one of the solved problems, they approached it with a radial calculation, which was the first I used, and a vertical calculation, which was the second.

Could you possibly clarify a bit more so I understand how I can fix it?
 
Both the normal force and the friction force have horizontal and vertical components.

The vertical components of the friction force and the normal force have to balance gravity.
The horizontal components of these forces have to produce the acceleration.
The maximum angle is the angle that the runner nearly slips down. The friction force will be pointed along the slope and upwards.
What you tried to do was valid except for forgetting those components. You'll get a much more complicated expression for tan(theta). It will be really easy to make a sign error here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top