Maximizing Energy Conservation in Particle Motion on a Helix Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a particle sliding on a helical wire. The particle is released from rest and the goal is to determine its speed when it reaches the ground using energy conservation principles. Initial and final energies are equated, leading to the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy. The solution simplifies to the formula v = 2√(πbg) by recognizing that potential energy decreases as the particle descends. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of using energy conservation over complex motion equations.
teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A particle P is free to slide on a smooth wire which has the form of a helix,
with a position vector given by:

r((t)) = a cosθ(t)i + a sinθ(t)j + bθ(t)k

The particle is released from rest at the point (a, 0, 2∏b). Using energy conservation for conservative forces, or otherwise, show that the speed of P when it reaches the ground at (a, 0, 0) is:​

v = 2sqrt(∏bg)




Homework Equations



All the equations of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that when you differentiate the position, you get velocity. So I did and got:

v(θ(t))=(a(-sinθ(t)) + (cosθ(t))(1))i + (acosθ(t)) + (sinθ(t))(1))j + (b+θ(t))k

from here I'm stuck.

I let the components for i,j and k equal to one another but I don't know what to do with the results. Please any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are just interested in the final speed, energy conservation is way easier than getting equations of motion.
Did you try this? What is the initial energy, what is the final energy?
 
I'll second that - otherwise you should probably convert to cylindrical coordinates.
 
Hi mfb and Simon, the help was much appreciated.

I was over complicating the question as you said. I just used the Conservation of Energy and the solution came easily.

PE=KE where;

PE=mgh and KE=0.5(m)(v^2)

h=2(pi)b as the coordinates go from (a,0,2(pi)b) to (a,0,0)

So then I got 2mg(pi)b=0.5(m)(v^2)

simplifying to get my desired answer of v=2sqrt((pi)bg)

Thanks again!
 
Well done - getting you to realize the advantages of using energy instead of forces is probably the point of the exercise.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top