Maximizing Intensity of Transmitted Light in Polarization Disks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on maximizing the intensity of transmitted light through three polarization disks with fixed angles for the first and third disks at 10 and 120 degrees, respectively. The user is trying to determine the optimal angle theta for the second disk to achieve maximum transmission intensity. Initial calculations indicate that while setting theta to 10 degrees maximizes intensity for the second disk, it results in low transmission through the third disk. The consensus is that the user should take the derivative of the intensity function or graph it to find the peak intensity. Additionally, participants provide guidance on formatting equations and subscripts in the forum.
Will
I am studying for our final, and there is this problem that is confusing me.

There are three disks, with transmission axis of the 1st being 10 deg. from the vertical, the 2nd at an angle theta from the vertical, and the 3rd at an angle 120 deg from the vertical. Unpolarized light, I(0) is incident on the first disk,. We need to find the angle theta for 2nd disk so that transmitied light from 3rd disk is of max intensity.
So I know that the unpolarized light automatically loses 1/2 of its intensity; I(1)=I(0)/2 and that the intensity of I(3) is given by [I(0)/2]cos^2(theta-10)cos^2(120-theta). I think the formula is correct. So how should I go about finding the max? Should I take the derivative of this function and find the zeros, or is there a better way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You do not need to take a derivative. The outgoing beam of the first polarizer is the incoming beam for the second, and so on. The I0 for each polarizer is the incoming beam for that polarizer. So, your I0 for the second is simply your answer for the first.
 
Will

Still don't quite get it. I(1) emegerges out with a polarized at an angle 10 degrees to the vertical. It then goes through disk 2, which makes a variable angle( the one we need to solve for), and emerges as I(2) with intensity I(1)cos^2(theta-10), right? Then it goes thru disk 3 and emerges with I(3)=I(2)cos^2(120-theta.
If I set theta equal to 10 degrees, I get maximum transmission of I(2). But when it gose thru I(3), cos^2(120-10) is small, so I get a low transmission. So I think I need to find an angle in the somewhere in between 10 and 120 dgrees. Perhaps I was unclear on my wording of the problem, the axis of the first and third disk are fixed , at 10 and 120 respectively, and the angle of the second is variable.

ps how do you make subscripts, and for that matter "pretty print" equations?
 


Originally posted by Will
I(1) emegerges out with a polarized at an angle 10 degrees to the vertical. It then goes through disk 2, which makes a variable angle( the one we need to solve for), and emerges as I(2) with intensity I(1)cos^2(theta-10), right?

Right.

Then it goes thru disk 3 and emerges with I(3)=I(2)cos^2(120-theta.
If I set theta equal to 10 degrees, I get maximum transmission of I(2). But when it gose thru I(3), cos^2(120-10) is small, so I get a low transmission. So I think I need to find an angle in the somewhere in between 10 and 120 dgrees. Perhaps I was unclear on my wording of the problem, the axis of the first and third disk are fixed , at 10 and 120 respectively, and the angle of the second is variable.

Oops...I made a mistake. I misread your problem, and you were right initially: You do need to take a derivative. Either that, or graph the function to find the peak.

You have:

I2(θ)=I0cos2(θ-10o)

and

I3(θ)=I2(θ)cos2(120o-θ)

which you should rewrite as:

I3(θ)=I0cos2(θ-10o)cos2(120o-θ)

ps how do you make subscripts,

Example: Type

I[ sub ]0[ /sub ]

without the spaces to get:

I0

Replace sub with sup for superscripts.

and for that matter "pretty print" equations?

Look at the Announcement at the top of all the science forums:

Howto: Making Math Symbols.

You can also get math symbols by clicking "Get More" on the smiley menu, but they do not look as good as the ones in the Announcement.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top