Maximizing Pulling Force with Static Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curieuse
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To maximize the pulling force on a box of sand with a static friction coefficient of 0.35 and a cable tension limit of 1100 N, the optimal angle between the cable and the horizontal is calculated to be 19.3°. This angle allows the tension's x-component to effectively overcome static friction. The maximum weight of the sand and box at this angle is determined to be approximately 341.9 kg, equating to a weight of about 3,335 N. The discussion also touches on the validity of the approach used to find the angle and suggests considering the second derivative for confirmation of a maximum. Overall, the solution aligns with the expected results found in reference materials.
Curieuse
Messages
51
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An initially stationary box of sand is to be pulled across a floor by means of a cable in which the tension should not exceed 1100 N. The coefficient of static friction between the box and the floor is 0.35.
(a) What should be the angle between the cable and the horizontal in order to pull the greatest amount of sand, and
(b) What is the weight of the sand and box in that situation?

Homework Equations



F=ma
fs-max = FNμs

The Attempt at a Solution



Because the block has to move after all,
the applied force's x-component must be greater than the frictional force that will oppose it by acting in the opposite direction with a maximum magnitude as static frictional force max fs-max.
So, T cosθ > μs(mg-T sinθ)
rewrite, T(cosθ + μssinθ)> 3.43 m
Besides 0 < T < 1100 N
So, 0 < T(cosθ + μssinθ) < 1100(T(cosθ + μssinθ))
And if 3.43 m is already lesser than T(cosθ + μssinθ),
It surely is lesser than 1100(T(cosθ + μssinθ))..
rewriting i get,
cosθ + 0.35 sinθ > 3.1*10-3 m------------------------(1)
Here, I got a gut feeling :smile: and a bit of crooked logic telling me that since the RHS is lesser than the LHS, I should probably be finding the maximum value of the LHS, which would give me the corresponding maximum value for the RHS.
So, I did the maxima for the LHS and got θ=19.3°
this, i resubstituted in (1) to get
m < 341.9 kg.
And so the (a) 19.3°
and (b) weight of the load so (341.9)(9.8)=3.35*103
which tallied with the answers at the back.
BUT is there another method to attack the problem? Is my logic crooked? Any better explanation for the key step where i find θ using maxima? Any advice to tidy up my reasoning in the rest of the solution is also highly welcome! Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    7.5 KB · Views: 410
Physics news on Phys.org
looks real good! I guess you could take the second derivative to be sure you have a max and not a min, which maybe you did, as you did not show calcs for determining the angle for max mass.
 
Yes, @PhantomJay! Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top