Maximum displacement from equilibrium of the mass as it osciallates

AI Thread Summary
A mass of 0.1 kg connected to a spring with a spring constant of 10 N/m oscillates on a frictionless table, with a speed of 3.0 m/s at a displacement of 0.2 m from equilibrium. The maximum displacement from equilibrium was initially calculated incorrectly as 0.969 m, but after reviewing the equations, the correct maximum displacement is 0.361 m. The discussion highlighted the use of energy conservation principles, specifically the formula relating potential and kinetic energy in simple harmonic motion. Participants confirmed that the original method was correct but emphasized the importance of squaring the angular frequency in calculations. The final resolution led to the correct maximum displacement of 0.36 m.
Reema
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A mass of 0.1 kg connected to a spring with a spring constant 10 N/M oscillates horizontally on frictionless table. The speed of the mass is 3.0 m/s when the displacement is 0.2 m form its equilibrium position.

What is the maximum displacement from equilibrium of the mass as it oscillates?

So ... the answer is 0.361m, but I did it one hundered times and I always get 0.969


First I found the frequency
009260845b0c28a45944ba1dc72179c5.png


I got 1.59 HZ so w= 9.99

then I used V= w ( √ A^2 - X^2 )



A^2= v^2/w + X^2

= 3^2 / 9.99 + o.2^2

A^2 = 0.94

A= 0.969m



 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method seems right to me. Check your algebra, though.
 
Thanks Leveret

do you think that there is something wrong with this equation A^2=( v^2/w) + X^2
because I thought it might be A^2=( v^2/w^2) + X^2 ?
 
Try looking at it from an energy conservation perspective.

are you aware of that formula?

its a much simpler method
 
dou you mean (PE = KE )
 
Last edited:
actually for simple harmonic motion (oscillation) there is a particular formula.
the formula is:

(1/2)kA^2 = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2

where (1/2)kA^2 is the total enegy, (1/2)kx^2 is the potential energy and (1/2)mv^2 is the kinetic energy

rearrange and you should be sweet :)also your method is correct ( in fact your equations are derived from the one i gave you). your mistake was you didnt square the omega
 
Last edited:
Wow .. Finally I got 0.36 :D

thaaaaaanks alot
 
Back
Top