Maximum interference of frequencies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the lowest two frequencies that create an interference maximum at a microphone positioned between two speakers. The initial confusion arose from using the speed of light instead of the speed of sound, which is 343 m/s in air. After correcting this error, the user seeks further guidance on completing the calculations. The basic formula for interference, L2-L1=mλ, is acknowledged as the starting point for finding the wavelengths. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct speed for accurate frequency calculations.
baylorbelle
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A microphone is located on the line connecting two speakers that are 0.650m apart and oscillating in phase. The microphone is 2.25m from the midpoint of the two speakers. What are the lowest two frequencies that produce an interference maximum at the microphone's location?


okay, so i have my diagram:
speakerproblem.jpg


I know that the basic formula is L2-L1=m\lambda , but whenever i do my math, find \lambda, and convert it to Hz using f=c/\lambda, I keep getting 4.0*10^8. I don't know where I'm messing up or how I need to approach this problem to even get two answers. Any guidance is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
baylorbelle said:
A microphone is located on the line connecting two speakers that are 0.650m apart and oscillating in phase. The microphone is 2.25m from the midpoint of the two speakers. What are the lowest two frequencies that produce an interference maximum at the microphone's location?

I know that the basic formula is L2-L1=m\lambda , but whenever i do my math, find \lambda, and convert it to Hz using f=c/\lambda, I keep getting 4.0*10^8. I don't know where I'm messing up or how I need to approach this problem to even get two answers. Any guidance is appreciated!

What speed of sound are you using?

I use 343 m/s in air. What are you using?
 
it figures it would be a simple mistake like that. I was using the speed of light instead of the speed of sound. Thanks for clearing up my careless error.
 
baylorbelle said:
it figures it would be a simple mistake like that. I was using the speed of light instead of the speed of sound. Thanks for clearing up my careless error.

That's a start then. Have you figured out the rest of it ok?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top