Maximum Mass for Spring-Induced Jump

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmiddlet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the maximum mass M for which a block will jump off the ground when a spring is involved. Initially, the block m is pushed down with a force of 3mg, leading to an equilibrium offset calculated as x = 3mg/k. The participants clarify that the net force should account for gravity, resulting in an updated equilibrium offset of x = 4mg/k. The correct approach to find the maximum upward displacement d involves evaluating the work done by forces, leading to the conclusion that M must be less than 2m for the block to lift off. The final consensus confirms the correct relationship between M and m in this spring-induced jump scenario.
tmiddlet
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework/coursework problem, but I came across it and wanted to check my answer.

Homework Statement


As in the diagram, there are two blocks of mass M and m. The mass m is suspended above M by a spring of spring constant k.

Initially, the block m is pushed down with a force 3mg until the system reaches equilibrium, then the force is released.

What is the maximum value for M for which the bottom block will jump off the ground?


Homework Equations


F = kx
F = mg
U = \frac{1}{2}kx^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I think this is the right way to do it, but I'm not sure.

To find the equilibrium offset:
3mg = kx
x = \frac{3mg}{k}

Finding the potential energy due to the spring:
\frac{1}{2}kx^2 = \frac{9m^2g^2}{2k}

To find the maximum upward offset (d) of the spring after release:
\int_{-3mg/k}^{d} (-kx-mg)dx = -\frac{9m^2g^2}{2k}

Evaluating this returns : (If I did it right)
d = \frac{mg(\sqrt{7}-1)}{k}

If kx > Mg, then the block will lift off, so I end up with:
M \lt m(\sqrt{7}-1)


I'm just curious if I got this right. If anybody is willing to try the problem or check my logic, that would be great. Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • diagram.jpg
    diagram.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 467
Physics news on Phys.org
Your logic works quite well, but:

tmiddlet said:
To find the equilibrium offset:
3mg = kx
x = \frac{3mg}{k}

The block is pushed with a force of 3mg, but there is gravity, too, so the net force is 4mg.

tmiddlet said:
To find the maximum upward offset (d) of the spring after release:
\int_{-3mg/k}^{d} (-kx-mg)dx = -\frac{9m^2g^2}{2k}

The integral is the work done by all forces between its initial and final position which is equal to the change of KE according to the work-energy theorem. d is the minimum upward displacement above the height of the relaxed spring where the spring force is Mg/k. As that, the velocity of the upper block is zero there. So the integral has to be zero.

ehild
 
Ok, I see.

Easy mistake:
x = \frac{4mg}{k}

It seems everything else I did was unnecessary, I don't need to deal with the potential energy.

So evaluating the integral:
\int_{\frac{-4mg}{k}}^{d} (-kx - mg) dx = 0

Yields:
d =\frac{2mg}{k}
M \lt 2m


This makes sense, Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top