Maximum number of orbiting planets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rothiemurchus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Planets
AI Thread Summary
There is no fixed limit to the number of planets that can orbit a star like the Sun, as the definition of a planet is not universally agreed upon. The current understanding suggests that our solar system is "dynamically full," meaning additional planets would struggle to maintain stable orbits within it, primarily outside Neptune. The formation of new planets beyond Neptune ceased due to insufficient material and slow orbital velocities in that region. In binary star systems, the presence of a partner star can restrict stable zones for planets, while close encounters in star clusters can strip outer planets away. Ultimately, the classification of celestial bodies as planets is arbitrary and varies based on definitions, with the IAU's recent decisions highlighting the complexity of this categorization.
Rothiemurchus
Messages
203
Reaction score
1
How many planets can orbit one Sun?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is no fixed limit. First you'd have to define a planet. I believe the IAU's definition only applies to our solar system. If a planet can be anything larger than a speck of dust, then the number for our sun is probably in the quadrillions.

Our solar system is said to be "dynamically full". That is, you can't place a planet inbetween any other two planets and have it remain stable for long periods of time. So for our solar system, you only hopes of adding more planets would be exterior to Neptune. And I believe there's room for one more interior to Mercury.

Our solar system stopped producing planets beyond Neptune because the disk of material didn't have enough mass at that distance, and or the orbital velocities are too slow at that distance to ensure that enough collisions take place.

Additionally, stars in binary systems have their stable zones limited by their binary partners, but there could be planets orbiting the pair of stars from a great distance.

And stars that spend too much time in star clusters can have their outer planets stripped away by close stellar encounters.

So its a function of a lot of things.
 
It also depends on what you mean by a planet!
There are a vast number of bits of rock / dust / ice orbiting the sun - calling 9 (now 8!) of them planets is a purely arbitrary distinction.
 
Yep, there's no truly scientific definition of "planet"...it's a spectrum of possibilities...although the IAU recently voted on a working definition which resulted in Pluto being redesignated as a "dwarf planet".
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top