Maximum Speed for Circular Turns: Radius Doubling Question Explained

AI Thread Summary
The maximum speed a car can take a circular turn is influenced by the radius and the static friction between the tires and the pavement. The relationship between speed and radius is not directly proportional; instead, it involves centripetal acceleration and frictional force. For a turn of radius 2R, the maximum speed is derived to be v√2, not 2v, due to the need to balance centripetal force with frictional force. The correct reasoning involves understanding that as the radius increases, the required centripetal acceleration changes, affecting the maximum speed achievable. Thus, the answer to the problem is B: v√2.
micjk
Messages
3
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The maximum speed with which a car can take a circular turn of radius R is v. The maximum speed with which the same car, under the same conditions, can take a circular turn of radius 2R is

A. 2v
B. v√2
C. 4v
D. 2v√2

Homework Equations


v = (2πr)/T

The Attempt at a Solution


Since radius is directly proportional to the velocity, wouldn't the answer just be A. 2v because doubling the radius would double the velocity? The correct answer is B. and I have no idea as to why. Could someone please explain why. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
micjk said:

Homework Statement


The maximum speed with which a car can take a circular turn of radius R is v. The maximum speed with which the same car, under the same conditions, can take a circular turn of radius 2R is

A. 2v
B. v√2
C. 4v
D. 2v√2

Homework Equations


v = (2πr)/T

The Attempt at a Solution


Since radius is directly proportional to the velocity, wouldn't the answer just be A. 2v because doubling the radius would double the velocity? The correct answer is B. and I have no idea as to why. Could someone please explain why. Thank you

The maximum uniform circular velocity, is limited by the static frictional force of the tires on the pavement.
So, Newton's 2nd law gives us $$∑F = f = m a_{\text{rad}}=\frac{m v^2}{R}$$
The maximum friction for available is fmax = usm g.
So, you need to consider the radial acceleration, $$a_{\text{rad}}=\frac{v^2}{R}$$ Try again with taking these equations into account, keeping in mind that the coefficient of static friction, hence f, will be the same regardless of the speed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes micjk
Mitchel Haas said:
The maximum uniform circular velocity, is limited by the static frictional force of the tires on the pavement.
So, Newton's 2nd law gives us $$∑F = m a_{\text{rad}}=\frac{m v^2}{R}$$
So, you need to consider the radial acceleration, $$a_{\text{rad}}=\frac{v^2}{R}$$ Try again with taking this equation into account, keeping in mind that the coefficient of static friction, hence f, will be the same regardless of the speed.

Ok I think I got it. Since in this case, the centripetal force is equal to the frictional force between the tires and the pavement, I can say that Fcentripetal = Ffrictional and therefore (m*v2)/2R = μ*m*a. I can solve for v and get v = √(2R * μ * a). I can also disregard μ since the frictional force will be constant. Then I can replace a with (v2)/R to get v = √(2R * v2/R. Simplifying that expression with give me maximum v = v√2
Is that correct?
 
  • Like
Likes Mitchel Haas
micjk said:
Ok I think I got it. Since in this case, the centripetal force is equal to the frictional force between the tires and the pavement, I can say that Fcentripetal = Ffrictional and therefore (m*v2)/2R = μ*m*a. I can solve for v and get v = √(2R * μ * a). I can also disregard μ since the frictional force will be constant. Then I can replace a with (v2)/R to get v = √(2R * v2/R. Simplifying that expression with give me maximum v = v√2
Is that correct?

Yes, this is correct, and you're using the proper reasoning. Be sure to distinguish between v1 and v2
 
  • Like
Likes micjk
Mitchel Haas said:
Yes, this is correct, and you're using the proper reasoning. Be sure to distinguish between v1 and v2

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top