Maximum speed on conservative forces problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum speed of a girl swinging on a playground swing, with her highest point at 3 m and lowest at 0.5 m, under the influence of gravity. The conservation of energy principle is applied, equating potential energy at the highest point to kinetic energy at the lowest point. The initial velocity is assumed to be zero at the highest point, simplifying the calculations. The correct formula derived is gh1 = (1/2)v^2 + gh2, allowing for the calculation of velocity by plugging in the height values. Ultimately, the solution emphasizes the importance of using the correct heights and understanding energy conservation in the problem.
fanie1031
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. A girl swings on a playground swing in such a way that at her highest point she is 3 m from the ground, while at her lowest point she is 0.5m from the ground. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. What is her maximum speed? Answer in units of m/s.


2. 1/2mVf^2 + mgyf = 1/2mVi^2 + mgyi


I made initial velocity to equal zero.
3. [Vf= (mghi - mghf)/ (1/2m)]^(1/2)

When I do this... I endup square rooting a negative number. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you use for initial and final height?

Is the velocity actually zero at the initial height?
 
I'm using .5 as her initial height and 3 as her final height. Is that my problem? And velocity... I just assumed... that may be wrong. (Thanks for the quick reply by the way!)
 
OOh I got it! I did this:

v=[2(gVi-gVf)]^(1/2)

You sparked my thinking. Thank you.
 
The problem mentions nothing about air resistance so we can assume that our forces our conservative. This meas that the sum of your forces at position 1 (her highest point) is equal to the sum of the forces at position 2 (her lowest point).

KE1 + PE1 = KE2 + PE2

You can elimitate your KE1 because at her highest point the girls velocity is 0.

This leaves us with PE1 = KE2 + PE2 We expand this formula to:

mgh1 = (1/2)m[v(squared)] + mgh2

this can be simplified by canceling out all of your masses.

gh1 = (1/2)[v(squared)] + gh2

Now just plug in your values and solve for your velocity.

Edit: Nevermind, you beat me to it.
 
Oh thank you for going ahead and writting up the solution.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top