Maxwell 2d (ANSYS): Bldc motor simulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges faced during BLDC motor simulation in ANSYS Maxwell 2D, particularly regarding loss calculations and discrepancies in core loss and stranded loss values between RMxprt and Maxwell. Users are seeking clarification on the formulas used for coil cross-section calculations, as well as the differences in slot fill factors between RMxprt and Maxwell 2D. There are also inquiries about achieving more accurate simulation results and reducing simulation time without sacrificing precision. Additionally, the moment of inertia calculations for the rotor and magnets are discussed, highlighting the need for consistency in settings. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of simulating BLDC motors accurately in Maxwell 2D.
mr.93
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi all
I have few questions in bldc motor simulation in maxwell 2d:

- I need help in loss calculation,I exported a bldc motor in rmxprt to maxwell 2d after entering core properties and w/kg data in 50hz,in 2d checked stator and rotor in set core loss and checked (consider core loss effect on field) in advanced for improving solution accuracy, after all simulation results 121.6w core loss (11.74w in rmxprt) and 12w StrandedLoss (36.2w in rmxprt).
with disabling (consider core loss effect on field) core loss change to 10.5w and StrandedLoss to 10.7w.
with changing coil cross section to N*Dcon^2 and N*pi*Dcon^2/4 (with same way as exporting do) StrandedLoss change to 17.7w and 22.8w but core loss change to 39.1w and 38.3w (without checking consider ...)bldc
so what may be wrong?

- with what formula coil cross section is made when coils and stator have same information?(why slot fill factor in rmxprt and maxwell 2d is not matched together?)

- moment of inertia in motion setup is the same as (estimated rotor moment of inertia) in rmxprt but with calculating moment of inertia for rotor and magnets in 3d with setting surrounding cylinder to different moment of inertia can be reach.

- I use meshing that provided with exporting,how can find simulation results near to practical Results?
- my simulation takes too long time to be stable,is it possibble to decrease minimum time step or time step without loosing precision?

-Thanks-
 
  • Like
Likes zand10000
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try asking here
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=107
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Try asking here
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=107
Thanks Greg,but I didn't mean maxwell render,my problems in Ansys Maxwell (or ansoft maxwell previously) software that used in electromagnetic analysis
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top