Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution and Probability

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution using entropy maximization and Lagrangian multipliers, resulting in the expression for the occupation number related to energy levels. The probability of finding a particle with momentum p is clarified as being meaningless for an exact value, instead defined over an interval using the distribution function. The relationship between the average number of particles with momentum and the total number of particles is established, leading to the definition of the distribution function f(p). The momentum distribution is expressed in terms of N and the velocity distribution is derived similarly. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of the correctness of the factors involved in the derivations.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
In the book 'Macroscopic and Statistical Thermodynamics' they derived the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution by maximizing entropy using lagrangian multipliers with constants ##\alpha## and ##\beta##.

The final result is given as:

\frac{\overline {n_j}}{g_j} = e^{-\beta \epsilon_j}e^{-\alpha}

where ##\overline {n_j}## is the occupation number and ##g_j## is the number of states of jth energy level.

After solving for ##e^{-\alpha} = \frac{N}{V}\left(\frac{h^2}{2\pi mkT}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}## and integrating density of states to find ##g_j = \frac{V}{h^3} 4\pi p^2 dp##:

We obtain the maxwell-boltzmann distribution:

\overline {n_j} = \overline {n_{(p)}} dp = N 4\pi \left(\frac{\beta}{2\pi m}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} p^2 e^{\frac{-p^2}{2mkT}} dp

I obtain the correct speed distribution ##\propto p^2 e^{\frac{-p^2}{2mkT}}##, but What is the probability/fraction of finding a particle with momentum p?
In Blundell's Book, a shorter approach is taken using gibbs' expression for entropy to find the Boltzmann probability:

20jqmtx.png


Here's the earlier reference to equation (4.13):

mt5ls7.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the momentum p is a continuous quantity, looking for the probability of finding a particle with exactly p is pretty meaningless. One usually says that, if f(p) is the Maxwell-Boltzman distribution then the probability of find a particle with momentum between p and p+dp is:
$$
P_{[p,p+dp]}=f(p)dp.
$$
For a general interval p\in[p_1,p_2] the probability is simply:
$$
P_{[p_1,p_2]}=\int_{p_1}^{p_2}f(p)dp.
$$
 
Einj said:
Since the momentum p is a continuous quantity, looking for the probability of finding a particle with exactly p is pretty meaningless. One usually says that, if f(p) is the Maxwell-Boltzman distribution then the probability of find a particle with momentum between p and p+dp is:
$$
P_{[p,p+dp]}=f(p)dp.
$$
For a general interval p\in[p_1,p_2] the probability is simply:
$$
P_{[p_1,p_2]}=\int_{p_1}^{p_2}f(p)dp.
$$

Yes I get all that, but what is ##f_{(p)}## from ##\frac{\overline {n_j}}{g_j} = e^{-\beta \epsilon_j}e^{-\alpha}##?
 
Well, I suppose that \bar{n}_j=\bar{n}(p)dp is the average number of particles with momentum between p and p+dp. As you can see from your expression it is equal to the total number of particles N times something. By definition, that "something" is your distribution f(p).
 
Just divide by N.
f=\frac n N
 
Einj said:
Well, I suppose that \bar{n}_j=\bar{n}(p)dp is the average number of particles with momentum between p and p+dp. As you can see from your expression it is equal to the total number of particles N times something. By definition, that "something" is your distribution f(p).

Ok, so the momentum distribution is:

\overline {n_j} = \overline {n}_{(\vec {p})} d^3p = N \left(\frac{\beta}{2\pi m}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} e^{\frac{-p^2}{2mkT}} d^3\vec{p}

By changing the dp's to dv's, thus the velocity distribution is:

\overline {n_j} = \overline {n}_{(\vec {v})} d^3v = N \left(\frac{\beta m}{2\pi }\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} e^{\frac{-p^2}{2mkT}} d^3\vec{v}

For a particular direction ##v_x##, simply just take one part of 'dv':

\overline {n_j} = \overline {n}_{(\vec {v_x})} dv_x = N \left(\frac{\beta m}{2\pi }\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{\frac{-p_x^2}{2mkT}} d\vec{v}_x

With ##f_{(\vec{v})} = \frac{n_j}{N} = \left(\frac{\beta m}{2\pi}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} e^{\frac{-p^2}{2mkT}}## and

##f_{(\vec{v_x})} = \left(\frac{\beta m}{2\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{\frac{-p_x^2}{2mkT}}##

To change from velocity to speed distribution simply expand the ##d^3\vec{p}## to ##4\pi p^2 dp## or ##d\vec{v_x} = 4\pi v^2_x dv_x##.
 
Last edited:
At a first glance I would say that all the factors are correct. So, yes!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top