Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution -- Maxwell's argument

In summary, the conversation discusses the assumption of stochastic independence for the three velocity components in the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. This assumption is intuitively reasonable but not necessarily true for all cases, as it is not valid in the relativistic case. The correct derivation of the distribution is through Boltzmann's kinetic/transport equation and his H theorem.
  • #1
pellman
684
5
The attached image shows the text I am following. I get that the 3-D pdf F can only depend on the speed v. I also understand that if f_x , f_y, f_z are the pdfs of the individual components of velocity, then rotational invariance requires them to all be the same function f_x = f_y = f_z = ϕ. What seems to be missing is that F must be separable, that is F must satisfy

F = f_x f_y f_z

Why must F be separable?
 

Attachments

  • Maxwell_argument.jpg
    Maxwell_argument.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 153
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's the assumption that the three velocity components are stochastically independent. Thus you have the ansatz
$$F(v)=f(v_x) f(v_y) f(v_z).$$
To get the functions ##F## and ##f## we take the logarithmic derivative with respect to ##v_x##, which leads to
$$\frac{1}{F(v)} \partial_{v_x} F(v)=\frac{1}{F(v)} \frac{v_x}{v} F'(v)=\frac{f'(v_x)}{f(v_x)}$$
or
$$\frac{F'(v)}{v F(v)}=\frac{f'(v_x)}{v_x f(v_x)}.$$
Now we define
$$\Phi(v)=\frac{F'(v)}{v F(v)}, \quad \phi(v_x)=\frac{f'(v_x)}{v_x f(v_x)}.$$
Then we have
$$\Phi(v)=\phi(v_x).$$
Then we take the derivative of this equation with, say, ##v_y##. The right-hand side doesn't depend on ##v_y## and thus
$$\frac{v_y}{v} \Phi'(v)=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \Phi'(v)=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \Phi(v)=C=\text{const}.$$
Thus we have
$$\Phi(v)=\frac{F'(v)}{v F(v)}=C \; \Rightarrow \; \frac{F'(v)}{F(v)}=C v \; \Rightarrow \; \ln \left (\frac{F(v)}{F(0)} \right) = \frac{C}{2} v^2 \; \Rightarrow \; F(v)=F(0) \exp \left (\frac{C}{2} v^2 \right).$$
For this to be properly normalizable distribution function, we must have ##C<0##, and thus the distribution is Gaussian. Now writing ##C=-2 \gamma## with ##\gamma>0##
$$F(v)=F(0) \exp (-\gamma \vec{v}^2)$$
and
$$f(v_x)=[F(0)]^{1/3} \exp(-\gamma v_x^2).$$
 
  • #3
Thank you for that. I follow all the steps but the first one. Why do we assume that the three velocity components are stochastically independent?
 
  • #4
That's an assumption. You can not derive it otherwise it would not be an assumption. It is quite intuitive though.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #5
Thanks but I don't see it. There must be some argument in favor of the assumption. Right?
 
  • #6
You are right. It's not a convincing argument since it's not correct in the relativistic case though it has the same symmetries argued with here.

The correct argument for the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is kinetic theory, which leads to the characterization of the equilibrium phase-space distributions as those of maximum entropy given the constraints imposed by conservation laws. This leads, for the canonical ensemble of the non-interacting gas, to
$$f(t,\vec{x},\vec{p})=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta H), \quad \beta=\frac{1}{k_{\text{B}} T}, \quad Z=\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 x \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{p} \exp(-\beta H).$$
 
  • #7
dRic2 said:
That's an assumption. You can not derive it otherwise it would not be an assumption. It is quite intuitive though.

I am not sure whether this is merely an assumption. In his "Lectures on Kinetic Theory of Gases and Statistical Physics“ [1], Alexander A. Schekochihin writes in section “2.1. Maxwell’s Distribution” (page 16):

Maxwell (1860) argued (or conjectured) that the three components of the velocity vector must be independent random variables.10

10It is possible to prove this for classical ideal gas either from Statistical Mechanics (see x11.10) or by analysing elastic binary collisions (Boltzmann 1995; Chapman & Cowling 1991), but here we will simply assume that this is true.

[1]
Lectures on Kinetic Theory of Gases and Statistical Physics
 
  • #8
There are two strangely mirrored but opposite assumptions here. On the one hand, stochastic independence amounts to saying "If we made a series of measurements to get the distribution of velocity components along one axis, it gives us no information about the distribution along orthogonal axes." However, rotational invariance means that if we know the distribution of the velocity component along anyone axis, we know it for ALL axes.
 
  • #9
Well, it's an assumption which by chance is true for the non-relativistic gas in classical approximation. The correct answer is Boltzmann's derivation from his kinetic/transport equation and his H theorem, which identifies the state of maximum entropy (with entropy defined as the Shannon-Jaynes entropy of information theory, as anticipated by Landauer and Szilard before) as the equilibrium state.

Already for the relativistic ideal gas it's not true but, in the rest frame of the fluid, reads
$$f(\vec{x},\vec{p})=\frac{g}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} \exp(-\beta \sqrt{c^2 \vec{p}^2+m^2 c^4}),$$
which does not factorize in the manner assumed by Maxwell.
 
  • Like
Likes pellman

What is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution?

The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is a probability distribution that describes the distribution of speeds of particles in a gas at a given temperature. It is named after James Clerk Maxwell and Ludwig Boltzmann, who independently developed the concept in the late 19th century.

What is Maxwell's argument for the distribution?

Maxwell's argument is based on the kinetic theory of gases, which states that the molecules of a gas are in constant motion and collide with each other and with the walls of the container. He argued that the distribution of molecular speeds in a gas should follow a specific mathematical form, which is now known as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

What factors affect the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution?

The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is affected by the temperature of the gas, the mass of the particles, and the volume of the container. As temperature increases, the distribution shifts towards higher speeds and becomes broader. Heavier particles have lower average speeds and a narrower distribution, while a larger container leads to a wider distribution with more particles having higher speeds.

How is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution related to the ideal gas law?

The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is a key component of the ideal gas law, which describes the relationship between pressure, volume, temperature, and the number of moles of a gas. The distribution is used to calculate the average speed of particles in a gas, which is a crucial factor in determining the pressure of the gas.

What are the real-world applications of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution?

The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is used in various fields, including physics, chemistry, and engineering. It is used to understand the behavior of gases in different conditions, such as in combustion engines, refrigeration systems, and atmospheric processes. It is also used in the study of diffusion, evaporation, and other physical processes involving gas molecules.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
821
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
903
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
785
Back
Top