Maxwell disc linked to bar unwinds but stays at same height by raising bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a Maxwell disc linked to a bar that unwinds while maintaining its height. The calculations begin with Newton's second law, leading to the conclusion that tension is half the weight of the mass. Torque analysis reveals that the angular acceleration is proportional to the tension and inversely related to the moment of inertia. A key point of confusion arises regarding the absence of time in the expression for initial angular velocity, which is attributed to constant torque resulting in constant angular acceleration. The participant acknowledges a mistake in equating angular velocity with linear acceleration, highlighting the complexity of the problem.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
The ends of thin threads tightly wound on the axle of radius ##r## of the Maxwell disc are attached to a horizontal bar. When the disc unwinds, the bar is raised to keep the disc at the same height. The mass of the disc with the axle is ##m##, the moment of inertia of the arrangement relative to its axis is ##I##.
Relevant Equations
Find the tension of each thread and the acceleration of the bar.
Here is a pictorial depiction of the problem

1719178014410.png


From Newton's 2nd law we have

$$2T-mg=0\implies T=\frac{mg}{2}$$

Then, considering the torques created by the threads we have

$$\vec{\tau}=I\vec{\alpha}=(-r\hat{k}+\frac{l}{2}\hat{i})\times T\hat{j}+(-r\hat{k}-\frac{l}{2}\hat{i})\times T\hat{j}$$

$$=2rT\hat{i}$$

$$\implies \alpha_z=\frac{2rT}{I}=\frac{rmg}{I}$$

Then

$$\omega_z=\frac{rmgt}{I}$$

The velocity of the axle at the point of contact of the thread with the axle is

$$\vec{v}=\vec{\omega}\times\vec{r}=\frac{rmgt}{I}\hat{i}\times (-r\hat{k})=\frac{r^2mgt}{I}\hat{j}$$

This is a problem from the book "Problems in General Physics" by Irodov. The back of the book answer says that

$$\omega_0=\frac{gmr^2}{I}$$

Why is there no factor of ##t## in the expression above?

As far as I can tell, because there is a constant torque there is a constant angular acceleration. Thus, angular velocity and tangential velocity (which coincides with the velocity of the bar being raised) are increasing with time.

My question is if I have made a mistake in my reasoning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question as posted asks for the linear acceleration of the bar. That matches the answer given. The only puzzle is that the LHS is ##\omega_0## instead of ##a##.
 
True what a silly oversight.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top