Maxwell Stress Tensor: Engineering Question Answered

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Maxwell Stress Tensor (MST) in calculating torque for electric motors, particularly when the airgap remains constant while the magnetic circuit length changes. The initial assertion is that the MST relates to linear momentum rather than angular momentum, leading to the conclusion that it may not directly calculate torque. However, it is acknowledged that linear forces derived from the MST can be converted to torque based on the geometry of the system. The conversation highlights the complexity of using tensors in electrical engineering and the need for a deeper understanding of their application in theoretical designs. Overall, the feasibility of using MST for torque calculations in this context remains debated.
mind_inertia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was talking with a friend today about electrical motors and we started talking about theoretical designs. One question came up which was could the Maxwell Stress Tensor be used to calculate the torque on a rotor of a motor where the airgap is held constant and the magnetic circuit length changes instead of the airgap like motors are designed with.

Could someone who is more physics savy than myself answer my theoretical engineering question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had a quick look. Here is what I think. Stress tensor arises as a result of invariance with respect to translations. So it contains linear momentum density flow (momentum and energy).

Torque is the rate of change of angular momentum. Angular momentum conservation corresponds to invariance with respect to rotations. So you need to go back to the Lagrangian density of the electromagnetic field and see what conservation law you get if you consider invariance under rotations. This will give you the current for the flow of angular momentum density, and this will give you the torque.

So in short. My answer is no. Maxwell stress tensor is for linear momentum, not angular one. But I could be wrong as this is the first time I did this rough calculation.

Of course what is possible, is to calculate linear force based on Maxwell Stress Tensor, and then convert it to torque through knowledge of the geometry of the object. I.e. if you find that field exerts more linear force on one of the stick, the stick will start spinning. This will allow you to find the torque
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mind_inertia
Thank you for your analysis Cryo! In electromagnetic simulation packages the Maxwell Stress Tensor is industry standard to calculate torques but from your answer I feel you are saying that Torques shouldn't be able to be calculated from the Maxwell Stress Tensor. Do I understand you correctly?

If so I wish to highlight the focus of my question. The torque of an electric motor is related to the change of airgap, the motor moves to minimize reluctance by shortening the air gap. Another method of minimizing reluctance and thereby deriving motion is by changing the effective magnetic circuit length. I feel that the MST should be able to calculate it but since this is a theoretical problem I thought it is best to approach physicists, particularly because I am unsure of how to use Tensors effectively on paper. I am slowly digesting the works of Kron in regards to applying Tensors to electrical engineering problems but it's a slow journey for me!

Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top