Maxwell Stress Tensor: Solutions for Polarized Waves & Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses two urgent problems involving the Maxwell stress tensor in the context of polarized waves and Coulomb's Law. The first problem requires demonstrating that the pressure on a screen from a linearly polarized plane wave equals the energy density of the incoming field, and confirming this with momentum density calculations. The second problem involves calculating the force between two repelling charges using the Maxwell stress tensor through surface integration. Participants suggest starting with the definition of the Maxwell stress tensor to better understand its physical implications. The focus is on extracting meaningful results from the tensor in both scenarios.
golfingboy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
URGENT!

Hi, I have a couple of urgent problems which are listed below. I am not sure what to do in either of them! If someone could help me as soon as possible that would be great!

Cheers

Problems:

1. Consider a linearly polarised plane wave incident normally on a slab of material that absorbs it completely. Use the Maxwell stress tensor to show that the pressure exerted on th screen is = to the energy density of the incoming field. Check that this agrees with the simpler method of using the momentum density of the field

2. Two charges of q at a distance r repel each other according to Coulomb's Law. Choose a suitable surface sorrounding one of the charges and calculate F by integration of the Mawell stress tensor
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi golfingboy,

If you're lost, it's always good to start at the start. What is the definition is the Maxwell stress tensor? You can begin by calculating what the stress tensor actually is in both situations. Now, how do you extract physically meaningful things from this object i.e. what does it do? Hint: think about integrals of the tensor over surfaces.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top