Maxwell's 4th equation. BUT, curl of H is zero everywhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter ugenetic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Maxwell's fourth equation, specifically examining the curl of the magnetic field H in the context of current distributions. Participants explore the implications of curl being zero in certain scenarios, particularly outside a current-carrying wire, and the conditions under which this holds true.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for curl and claims it results in zero, suggesting it represents the magnetic field H surrounding a current.
  • Another participant proposes a modified equation that includes a current distribution I(r) and suggests that the curl of H outside the wire should also be zero.
  • Some participants express doubts about the correctness of earlier equations and emphasize that the curl of H should be zero outside the wire, proposing alternative expressions for H.
  • A suggestion is made to assume a current distribution that is spread around the origin rather than concentrated, leading to a magnetic field expressed in terms of I(r) and its implications for curl calculations.
  • One participant notes that the zero result from Wolfram Alpha may stem from the singular nature of the magnetic field at x=y=0, which complicates the application of continuous function assumptions.
  • A later reply acknowledges the complexity of the notation and reiterates that Maxwell's fourth equation indicates the relationship between the curl of H and current density, noting that in an idealized scenario, curl(H) could be zero everywhere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the initial equations and the conditions under which the curl of H is zero. There is no consensus on the implications of the curl calculations, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of continuity in the magnetic field and the singular behavior at specific points, which may affect the validity of certain mathematical operations.

ugenetic
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
please go to "Wolfram Alpha" website, (google the term) and copy paste the following formula:

curl ( (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0)

you can see the result is zero

I think that's the expression of H surrounding a current. what am I missing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try this:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

Where I(r) = I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) represents the current flowing within radius r.
 
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)
 
Can you provide more information regarding the question?
 
ugenetic said:
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)

My suggestion was to assume a current distribution I(r) that is not concentrated on x=y=0, but spread around x=y=0.
Moreover, I suggest to assume any distribution of current I(r) (total current within radius r).
That leads to a magnetic field H = I(r)/(2 ∏ r) eΘ .
Replacing r as a function of (x,y,z) and taking the curl on Wolfram Alpha will help you understand what happens.

The clue is that with a continuous function I(r), the curl will give you the current density j = I'/(2πr) .

The reason why you got zero, is obviously because the derivation on Wolfram Alpha applies only on the domain of continuous functions. But you magnetic field is singular in x=y=0.

Have a check!
Simply paste this on Wolfram Alpha:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

And analyze the result:

I'(sqrt(x^2+y^2)) / (2 pi sqrt(x^2+y^2)) e_z

=

I'(r) / (2 pi r)

You will recognize there the current density j.
Note also that, in the problem you wanted to solve, I'(r) is zero everywhere except in x=y=0.

If you already followed a course on the theory of distribution you could take for I a Gaussian distribution with a variable width w.
In the limit of w->0, you will verify that j=curl(H) will tend to the Dirac delta distribution.
 
Last edited:
Excellent answer, thank you

I did check, but the notation of i (r) threw me off a bit, I just assumed that we are talking about the air portion of the H.

so, maxwell's 4th equation in point form means: the rotating tendency of an Magnetic field (H) at a POINT = current density at THAT point plus if there are any changing E field.
that's why in my infinitesimally small current will produce curl(H) = 0 every where, a scenario not possible in the real world. But, it is good to know that H generated by current will have curl of zero in air. (not counting the displacement current business)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K