Maxwell's Eqns & Einstein on Speed of Light

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations indicate that the speed of light is constant across all inertial reference frames, a conclusion supported by the Michelson-Morley experiment, which aimed to disprove Maxwell but instead confirmed his predictions. Initially, many physicists doubted Maxwell's findings, believing them to contradict established Newtonian laws. Einstein embraced Maxwell's theory, deriving Lorentz transformations to describe relativity, which elegantly unified the principles of electromagnetism with motion. His approach was straightforward, using basic calculus, which contributed to his lasting respect in the scientific community. Ultimately, Einstein's postulation of the constancy of the speed of light was based on well-established scientific facts rather than conjecture.
Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
what about maxwell's equations/theroy states that the speed of light is constant in all refrence frames? (how'd enstien figure that to be true)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It was by experiment, i.e. michelson-morley, that determined that the speed of light is constant in all inertial reference frames. But most people thought this was impossible, they thought Maxwell's equations must be wrong. You would too, if Newton's laws had been around for hundreds of years and Maxwell's only a decade or two. So Einstein just assumed Maxwell was right, by using Lortenz Transformations (which are just the Galeian transformations rederived with the speed of light constant) to describe relativity. Interesting enough Lortenz was the first to right down the equations for special relativity, but he didn't see in those equations the global picture that Einstein saw. Einstein saw the physical effects of when the speed of light is constant not just some equations that seemed to interpret a particular experiment.
 
When Maxwell's equations are cast in the form of the wave equation, the term \frac 1 {\sqrt \mu_0 \epsilon_0} shows up as the speed of electromagnetic waves. Maxwell did this in about 1867, when he computed the value of that constant, he was amazed to see that it equaled the current (for 1867) value of the speed of light. This was the first real evidence that light was electro magnetic in nature. No one, including Maxwell, was very happy with that result. Most assumed that there was an error somewhere, and waited for Maxwell to resolve what came to be known as Maxwell's Conundrum. Then in 1887 (A.E. was ~8yrs old) came the Michelson Morley experiment, which was intended to show experimentally that Maxwell had made a mistake. M&M failed to prove Maxwell wrong, indeed their experiment verified Maxwell's prediction at this point the great schism of Physics was an ugly fact.

Einstein, using his 2 basic postulates was able to DERIVE Lorentz's equations. His method was not restricted to E&M but applied to all physical bodies, His derivation was elegant and simple, requiring only basic calculus to understand. It may well have been the simplicity of his derivation which earned him the respect of his peers. And why that respect remains intact even a century later. Einstein was able to POSTULATE the constancy of c because it was an established fact though the work of Maxwell and Michelson & Morley. He did not pull it out of the air, but simply stated a fact that was well known to all Physic st of the late 19th century.
 
lol, my answer was just a back of the envelope approximation. I think you said more about it than my book.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top