Maxwell's Equations: Draw State of Polarization & Find B(x,t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter leoflindall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell's equations
leoflindall
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the state of polarization of the electromagnetic (EM) wave defined by

*****PLEASE NOTE EQUATION SHOWN IN NEXT POST****** (For some reason can't change it in this post...

with Eo real. Use a sentence to describe in words the state of polarization of this EM wave.

Use the differential form of Faraday's law to obtain B(x,t) for the same EM wave


Homework Equations



*****PLEASE NOTE EQUATION SHOWN IN NEXT POST****** (For some reason can't change it in this post...

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done the first part and found the EM wave to be circularly polarized (anticlockwise) with an amplitude of E0

i am unsure how to use faradays law. I tried breaking the LHS of faraday into its respective partial differential vector form, which i am currently working my way through but i am fairly sure it is wrong!

Any ideas on how to apply to get the magnetic field from the electric using faraday-maxwell's law would be greatly appreciated!

Many Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry i copied and pasted the equation and it has come out wrong...

It should read

E(x,t) = Eo( y + e^(i3\Pi/2) z )e^(i(kx-\omegat)) ,


Bold Letters denote unit vectors

Relevant Equations;

\nabla x E = - \partialB / \partial t (Faraday-Maxwell Equation)

Excuse my mistake!
 
Last edited:
Your electric field is given by

<br /> \mathbf{E}=E(x,y,z,t)=E_0\exp[i(kx-\omega t)]\hat{\mathbf{y}}+E_0\exp[i(kx-\omega t)]\exp\left[i\frac{3\pi}{2}\right]\hat{\mathbf{z}}<br />

correct? But we also know \mathbf{E}=Re(\mathbf{E}&#039;\exp[i\omega t]) where \mathbf{E}&#039; is the spatial component of the electric field. Then through Faraday's law,

<br /> \mathbf{B}&#039;=-\frac{1}{i\omega}\nabla\times\mathbf{E}&#039;<br />

You can then solve \mathbf{B}=Re(\mathbf{B}&#039;\exp[i\omega t]).
 
Now that I've had a good night's rest, you can actually ignore the fact that I said the real components of the spatial electric and magnetic components. This would only be true if your original electric field were given by cosine.
 
Thank you, that really helps! I appreciate it!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top