Maxwell's Equations in Vacuum: Constraints on Wave

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement



Condensed/simplified problem statement

\vec{E} = f_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + f_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\<br /> \vec{B} = g_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\

All the f and g functions go to zero as their parameters go to ±∞.

Show that gy = fz and gz = -fy

Homework Equations


\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \\<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0
\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}
\nabla \times \vec{B} = \frac{1}{c^{2}}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{y} + \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{z} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} = \\-(g^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{y} + g^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{z}) = c(g^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z})

The -c factors come from the chain rule when differentiating B with respect to t. So then I have the following.

-\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = -f^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct) = cg^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct) \\<br /> \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = f^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct) = cg^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)

The problem is to relate the functions directly and not by their derivatives. We are given that the functions all go to zero as the parameter goes to +/- infinity. So maybe it would be okay to just integrate without concern for a constant added on. But supposedly the c factor isn't there. The answer is supposed to haveg_{y} = -f_{z}. How do I get there?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
B and E do not have the same units, so f and g must be related with an appropriate factor of c. There's probably a typo in the problem. Your argument about the integration constants makes sense.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top