Understanding Maxwell's Equations: Gauss, Faraday & Ampère Laws

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's Equations illustrate the interdependence of electric and magnetic fields, where Gauss's Law indicates that electric charge generates electric flux, while magnetic fields do not arise from charge alone. Faraday's Law shows that a changing magnetic field induces an electric field, and Ampère's Law states that a changing electric field generates a magnetic field. This reciprocal relationship means that electric fields can indeed generate magnetic fields and vice versa. The propagation of electromagnetic waves can be derived from these equations, leading to the wave equation that describes how electric fields travel at the speed of light in a vacuum. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the behavior of electromagnetic waves.
tiagobt
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the physical meaning of Maxwell's Equation, but I'm confused about what generates what. According to Gauss's Law, electric charge placed somewhere generates electric flux, whereas Gauss's Law for Magnetism says that charge itself doesn't generate magnetic field. Faraday's Law says that magnetic field changing in time generates electric field, which may also generate voltage. Ampère's Law says that current (charge changing in time) generates magnetic field. Is this right?

Can electric field also generate magnetic field? How can I see this through Maxwell's Equations? How can I apply these concepts to the propagation of electromagnetic waves?

Thanks,

Tiago
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relevant Maxwell's equations in a vacuum are:

\nabla\times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial t} (Faraday's law)

\nabla\times\mathbf{B} = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} (Ampere's law)

So from Faraday's law you can see how a changing magnetic field can affect the electric field through the time derivative of B, while Ampere's law shows that a changing electric field affects the magnetic field similarly. Thus each type of field can change (or create) the other type. As for the propagation of electromagnetic waves, you want to take the curl of these equations and use some vector identities to derive the wave equation. You should be able to derive, for example,

\nabla^2\mathbf{E}=\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}

which is of course of the form of the wave equation, say for a field A with velocity v:

\nabla^2\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{v^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{A}}{\partial t^2}.

So the E field in a vacuum is a wave moving at speed c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0\epsilon_0}},

Mike
 
Basics first.
An electric field originates with a charged particle, only when the charged particle is in motion can it create a magnetic field. Then based on its mass and velocity it creates a matter wave equation, or if it occillates to create a wave phenomonon. These create the wavelength, the velocity of propogation is given in Mikeus' reply.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top