MCAT Passage: Inelastic Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving an inelastic collision between a car and a truck. Participants clarify that "just after the collision" refers to the moment post-impact before any significant skidding occurs. The conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are essential for solving the problem, with the coefficient of friction provided for alternative solution methods. One user confirms that their understanding of the problem led to successfully solving it. The conversation emphasizes the importance of interpreting the problem's wording correctly to apply the appropriate physics concepts.
mrlucky0
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] MCAT Passage: Inelastic Collision

Homework Statement



A car (1000 kg) and a truck (2000kg) start from rest on a long, straight track. At time t=0, the truck is at position x=0 and the car is at position x=100m. Both vehicles then accelerate toward each other and collide.

Both the truck and the car accelerate uniformly - and at the same rate - until the speed of the each vehicle is 21 m/s, just as they collide. The resulting collision is perfectly inelastic, and the vehicles skid for 7 m before coming to rest. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the track and the vehicle's tires is 0.35.

What was the total kinetic energy of the vehicles just after the collision?

A. 73.5 kJ
B. 147 kJ
C. 330.8 kJ
D. 661.5 kJ

Homework Equations



KE = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Can I apply the conservation of momentum here? I'm also not sure how to use the coefficient of kinetic friction although I'm sure the solution involves it.

I've determined that the initial total KE of the system is 661.5 kJ and was tempted to choose that as the answer but it's not right.

I'm also confused about the wording of the problem (if someone can clarify): does "just after the collision" imply after the cars have crashed but before the combined mass starts to skid? If this is the case, why bother with kinetic friction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mrlucky0,

Yes, I believe "just after the collision" means after the crash and before any appreciable skidding has occurred. I think the reason they give the coefficient of friction is so you can solve the problem in two ways: either use momentum conservation during the collision, or use an energy approach after the collision.
 
alphysicist said:
Hi mrlucky0,

Yes, I believe "just after the collision" means after the crash and before any appreciable skidding has occurred. I think the reason they give the coefficient of friction is so you can solve the problem in two ways: either use momentum conservation during the collision, or use an energy approach after the collision.

Thanks. Your tip helped me solve the problem!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top