Mean and Variance of Lognormal Distributions

royalstatus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that the natural log of the growth consumption rate is conditionally normally distributed. I am trying to convert it to a lognormal distribution, but I keep getting a variance that is different from what is in the solution manual. The problem is #3 in the document below
http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/profs/faia/welcome_files/ch2ans.pdf

Homework Equations


Log Ct+1/Log Ct ~ N[Et(logCt+1/logCt), Var (logCt+1/logCt)]

The Attempt at a Solution



I re-wrote Log Ct+1/Log Ct as an exponential function since log and e cancel out, and the mean is simply the expected value of function, but the variance I got was -1/2σ(Var Ct+1/Ct) which is different from what the solution manual says.

My problem is I don't understand how they got 1/2σ^2(Var Ct+1/Ct).
If anyone can explain that to me, I would be highly grateful.

For a clearer understanding of the question, you can look at #3 from the Solution Manual I posted above. It is Chapter 2, # 3 from Obstfeld and Rogoff's Foundation of International Economics. Thanks

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...2MtYmIxZi00OGVmLTkyMWUtYmU1M2E4Y2U0NGE4&hl=en
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
royalstatus said:

Homework Statement


Given that the natural log of the growth consumption rate is conditionally normally distributed. I am trying to convert it to a lognormal distribution, but I keep getting a variance that is different from what is in the solution manual. The problem is #3 in the document below
http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/profs/faia/welcome_files/ch2ans.pdf




Homework Equations


Log Ct+1/Log Ct ~ N[Et(logCt+1/logCt), Var (logCt+1/logCt)]


The Attempt at a Solution



I re-wrote Log Ct+1/Log Ct as an exponential function since log and e cancel out, and the mean is simply the expected value of function, but the variance I got was -1/2σ(Var Ct+1/Ct) which is different from what the solution manual says.

My problem is I don't understand how they got 1/2σ^2(Var Ct+1/Ct).
If anyone can explain that to me, I would be highly grateful.

For a clearer understanding of the question, you can look at #3 from the Solution Manual I posted above. It is Chapter 2, # 3 from Obstfeld and Rogoff's Foundation of International Economics. Thanks

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...2MtYmIxZi00OGVmLTkyMWUtYmU1M2E4Y2U0NGE4&hl=en

What do you get? For now, just forget the attached document and answer the question for X = exp(Y), where Y is normal with mean m and variance s^2.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The variance I got was -1/2σ(Var Ct+1/Ct)

I think the true variance might have something to do with the moment generating function for the lognormal distribution.

My answer is different from what is in the document, so I'm guessing I'm not thinking of this the right way
 
royalstatus said:
The variance I got was -1/2σ(Var Ct+1/Ct)

I think the true variance might have something to do with the moment generating function for the lognormal distribution.

My answer is different from what is in the document, so I'm guessing I'm not thinking of this the right way

Your variance formula cannot possibly be right: it is < 0, while variance is always >= 0 if it exists at all. Anyway, I asked you to forget the attachment and just answer a *simple question* for X = exp(Y) with Y~N(m,s^2). Using Ct and 1/Ct, etc., just confuses the issue. Possibly the reason you are having trouble is that you are so focused on the model and notation in the attachment that you are neglecting some basic probability results and methods that apply to any model, not just the one you are researching.

RGV
 
RGV,

Will it be Y~N(ln(m),ln(s^2))?

I'm not particularly sure of the question you are asking.
 
royalstatus said:
RGV,

Will it be Y~N(ln(m),ln(s^2))?

I'm not particularly sure of the question you are asking.

I am asking you to find EX and Var(X)---that was the question you originally posed to this forum. You claim your formula for Var(X) is wrong, because it disagrees with something in some paper. Well, maybe your formula is wrong, or maybe it is correct and the paper is wrong. Let us see your formula, so we can tell which is which.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top