Mean free path at low temperatures

AI Thread Summary
To evaluate thermal resistance at low temperatures, the mean free path of electrons and phonons in metals can be calculated using the formula l = (σn)^(-1), where l is the mean free path, n is the particle density, and σ is the collision cross-section. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the mean free path in different contexts, such as particle physics, where it may be referred to as attenuation or absorption length. Additionally, the question of whether there are different mean free paths near and far from walls is raised, indicating a potential complexity in the analysis. Overall, the mean free path is crucial for understanding thermal conductivity in metals at low temperatures. This foundational knowledge is essential for beginners in physics exploring thermal resistance.
Armandito
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, It's not a homework question, but as i am a beginner in physics, I prefer to post here first :

I try to evaluate thermal resistance at low temperature. I need to compute the mean free path of both electron and phonon in metals, but I do not find any formulas. Can anybody tell me where I could find that?

By the way, Is there two different mean free path : far from the wall and near the wall?

Best thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Armandito said:

Homework Statement



Hi, It's not a homework question, but as i am a beginner in physics, I prefer to post here first :

I try to evaluate thermal resistance at low temperature. I need to compute the mean free path of both electron and phonon in metals, but I do not find any formulas. Can anybody tell me where I could find that?

By the way, Is there two different mean free path : far from the wall and near the wall?

Best thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I assume that you know what mean free path is so here is the basic formula for the mean free path:

l=\left(\sigma n\right)^{-1}

where l is the mean free path, n is the number of target particles per unit volume, and \sigma is the effective cross sectional area for collision.

From this I guess you can derive whatever you want to get about mean free path.

If you are doing the particle physics, then the mean free path is replaced by the similar concept called 'attenuation length' or 'absorption length.' It is the distance \lambda into a material when the probability (that particle has not been absorbed) has dropped to 1/e.

Hope it helped.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top