Mean free path at low temperatures

AI Thread Summary
To evaluate thermal resistance at low temperatures, the mean free path of electrons and phonons in metals can be calculated using the formula l = (σn)^(-1), where l is the mean free path, n is the particle density, and σ is the collision cross-section. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the mean free path in different contexts, such as particle physics, where it may be referred to as attenuation or absorption length. Additionally, the question of whether there are different mean free paths near and far from walls is raised, indicating a potential complexity in the analysis. Overall, the mean free path is crucial for understanding thermal conductivity in metals at low temperatures. This foundational knowledge is essential for beginners in physics exploring thermal resistance.
Armandito
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, It's not a homework question, but as i am a beginner in physics, I prefer to post here first :

I try to evaluate thermal resistance at low temperature. I need to compute the mean free path of both electron and phonon in metals, but I do not find any formulas. Can anybody tell me where I could find that?

By the way, Is there two different mean free path : far from the wall and near the wall?

Best thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Armandito said:

Homework Statement



Hi, It's not a homework question, but as i am a beginner in physics, I prefer to post here first :

I try to evaluate thermal resistance at low temperature. I need to compute the mean free path of both electron and phonon in metals, but I do not find any formulas. Can anybody tell me where I could find that?

By the way, Is there two different mean free path : far from the wall and near the wall?

Best thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I assume that you know what mean free path is so here is the basic formula for the mean free path:

l=\left(\sigma n\right)^{-1}

where l is the mean free path, n is the number of target particles per unit volume, and \sigma is the effective cross sectional area for collision.

From this I guess you can derive whatever you want to get about mean free path.

If you are doing the particle physics, then the mean free path is replaced by the similar concept called 'attenuation length' or 'absorption length.' It is the distance \lambda into a material when the probability (that particle has not been absorbed) has dropped to 1/e.

Hope it helped.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top