Mean velocity in a circular pipe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the mean velocity in a circular pipe under frictionless, inviscid flow conditions. The velocity profile is defined as v(r) = 6 - 6r^{1.828}, with a volume flow rate of Q = 9 m³/s and a pipe radius of R = 1 m. Two methods were explored: dividing the flow rate by the cross-sectional area, yielding v_{av} = 9/π, and integrating the velocity profile, resulting in v_{av} = 3.858. The discrepancy arises from the need to account for the area when calculating the mean velocity, confirming that the correct approach involves integrating over the area and dividing by the total area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly inviscid flow.
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Knowledge of velocity profiles in fluid mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of flow rate and cross-sectional area in circular pipes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity profiles in circular pipes under various flow conditions.
  • Learn about the application of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics.
  • Explore the concept of mean velocity in non-uniform flow scenarios.
  • Investigate the implications of viscous effects on flow profiles in pipes.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, engineers working with pipe flow systems, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of mean velocity calculations in circular conduits.

kbaumen
Messages
190
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Frictionless, inviscous flow in a circular pipe.

Velocity profile, v(r) = 6 - 6r^{1.828}
Volume flowrate, Q = 9 \frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{s}}
Pipe radius, R = 1 m
Given velocities, v(0) = 6 m/s, v(R) = 0 m/s.

Find mean velocity v_{av}

2. The attempt at a solution
If I just divide the flowrate by area, I get the correct answer - 9/\pi (correct according to the tutorial solutions anyway). It also seems to make sense.

However, if I integrate the velocity along r from 0 to R and divide everything by R, I get a different value.

<br /> v_{av} = \frac{1}{R} \int_0^R (6 - 6r^{1.828}) \mathrm{d}r = 3.858<br />

Can anyone explain the discrepancy? To me both approaches make sense but I can't work out why the results are different.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kbaumen! :smile:

for an average, shouldn't the integral be (1/πR2) ∫ 2πrdr etc ?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kbaumen! :smile:

for an average, shouldn't the integral be (1/πR2) ∫ 2πrdr etc ?

Cheers, that actually makes sense. Integrate over area and divide by area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K