B Measurement and Uncertainities

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how to find the slope (or gradient) of a straight line using the formula (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1). Participants clarify that the values 0.039 and 7.88 represent specific points on a graph, with 0.039 m corresponding to 7.88 N in SI units. Choosing extreme points, such as the origin and the highest value, minimizes error in slope calculations. The conversation emphasizes that using points that are too close can lead to larger estimation errors. Overall, the importance of selecting appropriate points for accurate measurements is highlighted.
Anonymous1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can you guys help me, I do not understand this page.
77C90D88-1D44-42C0-B56F-03FC34E1C836_1_105_c.jpeg


Can someone explain this page to me please, Especially the part where it says (0.0390, 7.88).

By the way, I am new here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand how you must proceed to find the slope (or gradient) of a straight line? If so, please post an explanation to make sure that you do.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
kuruman said:
Do you understand how you must proceed to find the slope (or gradient) of a straight line? If so, please post an explanation to make sure that you do.

Yeh, It is just (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)Here what I don't understand is why are they choosing 0.039 as a x value why can't they choose another point.
 
Anonymous1 said:
Yeh, It is just (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)Here what I don't understand is why are they choosing 0.039 as a x value why can't they choose another point.
You will notice that they chose the extreme points on the graph, the origin and the highest value. This reduces the error when you do the division. If the points are too close to each other, then the error in the estimate will be larger.

On edit: 0.039 m = 3.9 cm. That's the value in SI units at which the force is 7.88 N.
 
kuruman said:
You will notice that they chose the extreme points on the graph, the origin and the highest value. This reduces the error when you do the division. If the points are too close to each other, then the error in the estimate will be larger.

Oh yeh true,
thank you so much
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
265
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
797
Back
Top