Measuring g, but not knowing the centre of mass - problem?

AI Thread Summary
Measuring gravitational field strength (g) can be affected by the location of the pendulum's center of mass, particularly if the pendulum is a compound pendulum. To ensure accurate results, it's important to either determine the center of mass through a separate investigation or make an educated guess. The length of the pendulum should be significantly larger than the size of the bob to minimize uncertainties in measurements. If the bob's size is comparable to the pendulum length, it can introduce significant error in the period calculation. Proper design and measurement techniques are crucial for reliable experimental outcomes.
sexysam_short
Hiya!

I'm confused, for my Physics A2 Coursework we're measuring g (gravitational field strength) and I don't know the centre of mass of the pendulum.

Will this affect my experiment and/or results? Should I do something to overcome it?

Please Help!

Sam(antha) xx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it will. You'll have to do a separate investigation to find the location of the centre of mass. Either that, or make an educated guess. Further, if the pendulum is a rigid mass that rotates about the pendulum pivot, it is actually a compound pendulum, and even the centre of mass won't tell you all you need. You'll need the moment of inertia. (But I can't imagine that the experiment is so poorly designed that you have to worry about these complications.)
You are best off if you can design your pendulum yourself. Then just make sure to make the length large compared with the size of the bob.
 
Thanks loads! What are the advantages of the length being large compared with the size of the bob?

So, will it be ok if I just basically measure the length of the string that the pendulum is made from?
 
Consider that the formula of the period is
T=2\pi\sqrt{l\over g}
If the bob is an extended mass of unknown composition 1 cm in size and the string is 1m long, the length to the c.of.m is 1.005m plus or minus 5mm. So the length l can be thought of as uncertain by the bob size, 0.5% in the case of the example I just gave. This makes the period uncertain by .25%. If the bob was 10cm in size, the period uncertainty would be 2.5%.
 
That makes loads of sense! Thank you lots again!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top