Measuring gravitational acceleration in a vacuum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment to measure gravitational acceleration using a sealed plastic tube and motion detectors. While the proposed setup is viable, it is noted that removing air from the tube may only be necessary for lightweight objects like feathers. Accurate timing is emphasized as crucial for measuring gravitational acceleration, with suggestions to explore various methods, including pendulums and super balls. A recommendation is made to reference an article on constructing a photogate timer for improved timing accuracy. Overall, the experiment's design can be enhanced by considering alternative measurement techniques and reliable timing mechanisms.
Skorbee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have to measure gravitational acceleration, and calculate my rate of error.
The experiment i came up with is: a thick plastic tube, with no air inside,
on the top side some sort of release mechanism, then have two motion detctors, 1M apart from each other, hooked up to a stopwatch to measure the time taken for an object to fall that one meter.
what do you guys think of this experiment?
anything that i need to improve on this experiment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This experiment will work however removing the air from the column is probably not necessary unless you are dropping a feather. There are lots of ways to measure "g" ,the trick is accurately measuring the time for the object to drop. Google "measuring acceleration due to gravity" will give you lots of ideas including using pendulums and super balls.
 
Thanks,
Have you got any good directions as to motion detectors?
should I just pull apart one of those motion detectors for garage lights?
Regards, Steven
 
You might try this. You can probably get this article at a collage library or interlibrary loan. RTW

A stopwatch-based photogate timer
The Physics Teacher -- October 2000 -- Volume 38, Issue 7, pp. 405-407
Issue Date: October 2000
This paper describes the construction of an inexpensive photogate timer that uses a flashlight-infrared phototransistor photogate and a simple electronic circuit that triggers an electronic stopwatch. This photogate timer uses readily available parts and is relatively easy to construct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top