Measuring pressure across a centrifugal pump

AI Thread Summary
To measure flow rate in a pipe with a centrifugal pump, installing pressure gauges before and after the pump can provide data for flow rate calculations using a look-up table. However, an orifice plate is often necessary between the gauges to obtain accurate differential pressure readings. The head flow curve for the pump is essential, as it allows for the calculation of head based on the differential pressure across the pump. This method enables users to derive flow rates effectively. Accurate measurements depend on proper setup and understanding of the pump's characteristics.
djohnson83
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This should be an easy one but here goes...

I am trying to easily measure flow rate in a pipe which has an in line centrifugal pump (Grundfos UPS 25-60) creating the head in the system. I have been told that installing a pressure gauge before and directly after the pump will give me system flow rate from a look-up table. Is this the case?

My recolection is that you need some kind of orifice plate in the flow and between the two gauges to get a useful reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have the head flow curve for the pump you can calculate the head from the DP across the pump and from that look up the flow.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top