Measuring Torque Without Torsion Dynamometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter AFIST2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring torque without a torsion dynamometer, as outlined in a specific experiment. One suggested method involves using the equation τ = Iα, though concerns are raised about the variability of torque over time. Another proposed approach is to use springs to create a balance of torques, where the magnetic torque equals the spring torque at equilibrium. Practical considerations include using lightweight, non-ferrous springs to avoid interference with the magnetic field and ensuring accurate angle measurements. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful setup and adjustments to effectively measure torque manually.
AFIST2
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

hi
i need to perform the experiment described in this link
http://www.phywe.com/index.php/fuseaction/download/lrn_file/versuchsanleitungen/P2430400/e/P2430400.pdf


so i need to measure the torque
in the experiment they use Torsion dynamometer to do the job
but i need to measure the torque without this device
how can i do this manually?2. Homework Equations

τ = m × B = mBsinθ3. The Attempt at a Solution

i really don't have a good idea how to perform this but i may suggest the following ways:

we may use the equation:
τ=Iα
α is the angular acceleration and I is the inertia moment
but i think there is a problem with this because the torque is not constant but it change with time
because the angle between the field and the moment changes in time
so i don't really understand how this is works (what τ exactly they measure?)

another way is to attach a spring to the loop so there is anothe torque (in the opposite direction) that acts on the loop
therefore at equilibrium the magnetic torque will be the same as the spring torque
m × B = kx × r
therfore the torque i need is
τ=kx × r
and these quantities i can measure

please give me your opinions or better ideas to measure the torque

thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The spring sounds good to me, but there are some practical difficulties.
The torque will be small, so you want a very light, stretchy spring. To prevent the loop twisting out of the vertical, I suggest two identical springs, one attached to each side of the loop. If the springs are ferrous, you'll need to make sure they are well outside the magnetic field, attached by long thin strings to the loop.
I assume you want multiple readings, at different rotation angles. You can move the springs closer/further away to adjust the balance point.
 
thank you very much.. i will take your notes into consideration
 
AFIST2 said:
thank you very much.. i will take your notes into consideration
Forgot to mention... you'll need to take into account the angle that the strings/springs make to the plane of the loop.
 
you mean in the expression kx × r = kx⋅r⋅sinβ right?
 
AFIST2 said:
you mean in the expression kx × r = kx⋅r⋅sinβ right?
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top