Classical Mechanics by Arnold Sommerfeld- review

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the exploration of classical mechanics, specifically the works of Arnold Sommerfeld. Participants express admiration for Sommerfeld's "Lectures on Theoretical Physics," highlighting its clarity and thoroughness in mathematical derivations, particularly praising Volume 6 on partial differential equations. While acknowledging the age of Sommerfeld's texts, they note their enduring value, especially in classical physics, despite some outdated concepts. Comparisons are made to other significant works in classical mechanics, including those by Whittaker and the Landau & Lifshitz series, with a mention of Pauli's lectures for their modern relevance. The conversation also touches on the influence of Sommerfeld as a teacher, contributing significantly to the development of modern physics. Additionally, Herbert Goldstein's textbook is recommended for bridging classical and quantum physics, with specific chapters noted for their effectiveness in preparing students for advanced quantum mechanics.
Bleakfacade
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I am trying to dig deep into classical mechanics. Among many suggestions, this was an odd one to me. I know of Arnold Sommerfeld and his work, but I have not read any of his works(books, papers, .etc). I tried to find reviews of this book online to no avail. If there are people who have read the book, may I ask you to give me a brief review? What inclinations and school of thought does Sommerfeld adhere to? I have gone through the book, its chapters but I thought I'd get some opinions before I begin studying it in detail. I thank all responses in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sommerfeld was one of the greatest theoretical-physics teachers of all time. Just look at the Nobel-prize winners' list and check, who is a pupil of Sommerfeld's. The six-volume set "Lectures on theoretical physics" immediately shows, how this comes about. It's simply very good. He gives precisely all the mathmatical steps in a derivation with utmost clarity. Nevertheless, it's not a simple read. In my opinion the best volume of the entire great set is Vol. 6 on partial differential equations of mathematical physics.

Of course, these books are pretty old (written in the 1940ies and 50ies) and thus not always up to date (e.g., he uses the "##\mathrm{i} c t## metric" for relativity or no Dirac ##\delta## distribution to define Green's functions although in fact he has invented this idea as early as around 1910). You should definitely have a look at Sommerfeld's textbooks but make sure to also have a look at more recent textbooks on the same subject. Of course, as far classical physics is concerned, there's not too much to be desired.
 
Believe me, there's always a benefit from reading a well-written, not outdated textbook. For classical mechanics, there are 2 major textbooks of the 1920's: the one by Sommerfeld and the one by Whittaker. 1930s brought us a third amazing piece of writing: the 1st volume of the Landau & Lifschitz series.
 
Another great older work are Pauli's lectures. They are in the Sommerfeld style but cover also more modern topics as wave mechanics (the best book on wave mechanics I know). Interestingly there's no classical mechanics, but the series starts with electrodynamics. The last volume is about quantum field theory. It's a good source to learn about the details of free propagagors in time-position representation but otherwise this volume is only of a historical interest. The other 5 volumes are masterpieces with high value also for modern students.
 
Thank you all so very much. This is certainly enlightening.
@vanhees71: Now that is some studentship Sommerfeld had, goodness me! I am overwhelmed, it seems he nurtured modern physics in his classrooms. I never knew that he was this central to Quantum theory.
 
I would have to recommend Herbert Goldstein. I have 2nd edition, and chapters 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11 do a great job preparing you for quantum physics at the level of J. J. Sakurai's text on Modern Quantum Mechanics. To give you and idea of what I mean, I'm attaching a step-by-step word document I extracted from Goldstein, chapters 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 connecting classical physics to old quantum mechanics, and the Schrodinger and Heisenberg's paths to QM. Please share the file if it's useful.
 

Attachments

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top