Mechanics: Coordinate systems and vector's

Unto
Messages
128
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ant walks from the inside to the outside of a rotating turntable. Write down it's velocity vector.

Use polar the cartesian coordinates.


Homework Equations



I have already derived the velocity vector in polar coordinates which is:

\hat{v} = \dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\vartheta}\hat{\vartheta}



The Attempt at a Solution



The table is rotating at a velocity \hat{v} whilst the ant we assume just walks in a straight line along direction\hat{j} in it's reference frame there is nothing odd, it is walking in a straight line. However in the observers reference frame is is moving in a circle due to the motion of the turntable.. So do I take it's cartesian velocity vector \dot{r}\hat{r} and simply add it with the velocity of the turntable \dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\vartheta}\hat{\vartheta} ??

I'm not quite sure how this works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah I've done it in polar coordinates. I was half right about the addition, but I was unsure about the angular velcity of the turntable. Now doing it in cartesian.
 
Unsure about cartesian coordinates... I've considered the velocity of the ant in x and y directions Vx = ucos theta
Vy = usin theta

Then I considered a point on the turntable which has an angular velocity rw...

I don't know what to do now...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top