Mechanics of Wheel and Forces Involved

AI Thread Summary
An axle being pulled with a tractive effort E can indeed be resolved into a couple and a forward force at the contact point with the surface. Adding a limiting friction force F that acts backward is valid, and if E exceeds F, the wheel will slip. The discussion highlights the mechanics of braking on a wheel, particularly in scenarios where a sliding friction force is applied without locking the wheels. For a weightless wheel with mass M, the forces involved can be resolved to determine the deceleration of the wheel using the equation -Fb = Ma. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing wheel behavior under different forces.
Eugbug
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If an axle is being pulled with a tractive effort E, can this be resolved into a couple and forwards force E at the point of contact with a surface? Is it correct to add a limiting friction force F acting backwards against the direction of motion and if this is exceeded by E, does the wheel slip?
 

Attachments

  • wheel01.jpg
    wheel01.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Eugbug! :smile:
Eugbug said:
If an axle is being pulled with a tractive effort E, can this be resolved into a couple and forwards force E at the point of contact with a surface?

Yes, that's completely correct …

the two alternative descriptions are completely equivalent. :smile:

But I don't see how that helps you with the friction force :confused:
Is it correct to add a limiting friction force F acting backwards against the direction of motion and if this is exceeded by E, does the wheel slip?
 
The inspiration for this question came about when I was coming down a mountain at top speed on my mountain bike and was thinking about how braking works on a wheel and whether a skid can occur if enough braking force is applied and the wheels don't actually lock.
To make things simple, take a single wheel rolling along a level surface. The wheel is weightless so there is no moment of inertia to take into account, just say there is a mass M attached to the axle. If a braking force is applied at the perimeter of the wheel and this produces a sliding friction force Fb acting against the direction of rotation of the wheel, what are the forces involved and how do you work out the deceleration of the wheel? The velocity of the wheel is v.

The way I would approach things is to resolve Fb into a couple Fb and a force Fb acting against the direction of motion at the axle and then the equation of motion becomes:

-Fb = Ma where a is the deceleration of the wheel. Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • wheel02.jpg
    wheel02.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 441
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top