I Medical Physics: the spine as a pivot

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the mechanics of the spine as a pivot point in relation to muscle forces. The user, Mahavir, seeks clarification on why a larger force (T) is needed to balance the forces acting on the spine. It is explained that the lever arm of the force exerted by the spine is shorter than that of the weight (W), necessitating a greater force to achieve torque balance. This principle highlights the relationship between lever arms and the forces required for equilibrium. The conversation concludes with Mahavir expressing gratitude for the clarification received.
Mahavir
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
So, as I came across a point that I'm struggling to grasp and I was hoping someone here could kindly help me out.

I've attached a diagram that describes the issue.

  • T represents all the muscles acting on the spine;
  • R is the force of the spine (pivot).
Where I get confused is why a larger force T is necessary to balance the forces?

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards,

Mahavir
 

Attachments

  • Snip20180815_1.png
    Snip20180815_1.png
    23 KB · Views: 412
Physics news on Phys.org
Mahavir said:
Where I get confused is why a larger force T is necessary to balance the forces?
How do the lever arms of "the forces" compare to the lever arm of T?
 
A.T. said:
How do the lever arms of "the forces" compare to the lever arm of T?

Hi A.T.,

Thank you for your reply. Oh, thank you. The lever arm of the Force T (spine) is a lot shorter than the lever arm of W and therefore in order for their torques to balance, the force exerted by T needs to be a lot higher than the weight.

Is that correct?
 
A.T. said:
How do the lever arms of "the forces" compare to the lever arm of T?

I would really appreciate your answer to my above query, please.
 
Mahavir said:
The lever arm of the Force T (spine) is a lot shorter than the lever arm of W and therefore in order for their torques to balance, the force exerted by T needs to be a lot higher than the weight.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Mahavir
A.T. said:
Yes.

Got it, thanks a lot! :)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top