Megger Testing on Distribution Transformers

AI Thread Summary
Megger testing of distribution transformers highlights the significance of including LV/HV bushings in the assessment. High readings when bushings are disconnected indicate they may be contributing to lower insulation resistance when reconnected. Testing individual bushings can reveal issues, as demonstrated by a case where replacing one bushing significantly improved readings. The results suggest that Megger measurements reflect not only the transformer windings but also the condition of the bushings and other components in the circuit. Overall, while Megger testing can identify weak segments, it may not reliably predict the transformer's overall lifespan.
Dante Heater
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In Megger testing distribution transformers, how much importance is there in including the LV/HV bushings in the test. If you disconnect and have high readings independant of the bushing, and then put the bushings back into the circuit and the readings fall dramatically, what is that saying about the bushings? Thanks...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Dante Heater said:
In Megger testing distribution transformers, how much importance is there in including the LV/HV bushings in the test. If you disconnect and have high readings independant of the bushing, and then put the bushings back into the circuit and the readings fall dramatically, what is that saying about the bushings? Thanks...

There are at least 4 bushings. You should connect one at a time and see if any individual bushing causes readings to fall dramatically.
 
I am a little confused by your question - are you referring to the PF Tap on a HV Bushing (not really a distribution transformer) - or a basic bushing like on a pole mount or pad type transformer I am assuming the basic bushing - say 15KV and below?

I do not recall ever disconnecting the bushings unless we had a bad reading for the whole unit - so you are opening the transformer and disconnecting the bushings internally? - or remioving the busing form the outside, pulling out the leads, and disconnecting? IMO- the whole act of opening these transformers and working in them presents far more risk than the benefit of testing individual components.

Then what do you mean by High readings ( high leakage =bad or High M Ohms = Good).
 
"I am a little confused by your question"

Me too. Dante, is your question hypothetical of did you actually disconnect the bushings from the transformer?
 
Actually measured the transformer with the bushings cut out (yes we were inside the 75 kVa pole mount transformer). The entire unit measured less than 500 Mega ohms on the Megger handheld. When we opened unit and disconnected the bushings we were in the 1.5 Giga ohm reading range. It is obvious that the bushings play a role, but by independantly replacing each of the three bushings, the numbers stayed below 500 Mega ohms until the third bushing was replaced. At that time the unit jumped up to 150 Giga ohms. In measuring the bushings independently to ground/tank they read 200 Mega ohms. We believe that there must have been some issue in the bushing. But what it tells us that a Megger measurement doesn't only take into account the coil/windings for potential life, but also anything else in the circuit. Due to the parallel hookups, it seems that if any of the touch points are less than 500 Mega ohms, the unit will not meet the standard.
 
The way you posted in #1 - is not the procedure in #5. Yes - the point of testing the whole thing is any weak segment will be "seen" by the megger - you then disconnect individual elements - to identify the problem. The megger is is (IMO) relatively poor in determining potential life - but will help to identify trans that need further investigation. If for example you disconnected each element and found one of the windings was the weak link -- the transformer could be processed, but they are often not worth the effort.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top