B Melting a nail with high currents

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformer
AI Thread Summary
A user melted a nail using a transformer setup but is confused about the resistance measurements and current calculations. The output voltage was measured at around 2 V, but the nail's resistance was unexpectedly high at 6 Ohms. Suggestions included checking the multimeter's calibration and considering contact resistance, as initial measurements were unstable. It was noted that standard digital multimeters may not accurately measure low resistance, and using a 4-wire ohmmeter could provide better results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper measurement techniques and equipment for accurate readings.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
I melted a nail using a transformer with 500 windings on the primary and 5 on the secondary and 220 V input voltage, but I can't make the numbers work out. I measured the output voltage to be around 2 V, which makes sense.

Trying to measure the resistance of the nail directly with a multimeter yields around 6 Ohms, which appears be way to high. With a different power supply I can get 10 A across the nail at around 1 V, which leads to 0.1 Ohms, but this would still only lead to 20 A with the transformer, which still seems way too low to make it melt.

What's wrong here? And why is the resistance measured with the multimeter so far off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
What's wrong here? And why is the resistance measured with the multimeter so far off?
Was the multimeter calibrated? Did it have lead resistance and contact resistance? Measure it by shorting the test probes, and check the zero calibration.

What is the length and diameter of the iron? nail ?
What is the length and diameter of the copper? wire, used for the secondary winding ?
 
The diameter is 4 mm and the distance between the contacts of the secondary is 5.4 cm. Using the resisitivity of iron, I get ##4\cdot 10^{-4}\enspace\Omega## , which seems about right.
I also found a different isolation transformer with an input ammeter that showed 3 A at 200 V, so the output current should be in the hundreds A, which makes much more sense.

First I just pushed the probes of the multimeter against the nail, which gave very unstable values. Then I used crocodile clips. Could it be that most of the resistance is due to the contacts? Should I maybe file down the surface of the nail?
 
greypilgrim said:
Could it be that most of the resistance is due to the contacts?
Yes.

Most DMMs just aren't designed to resolve very low resistance. You would probably be better off using it to measure current, at a high current level, and then voltage and calculating the resistance.

Read about "4-wire ohmmeters" or "kelvin connections".
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top