Member of Michio Kakus's organisation

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoumyaBanerjee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Member
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the future of the Sun and its effects on Earth as it transitions from hydrogen to helium fusion. It clarifies that while the Sun will lose some mass during this process, the reduction will be less than one percent, which is insufficient to significantly alter its gravitational pull on Earth. Consequently, the Earth's orbit will not change dramatically, despite the Sun expanding and increasing in size. The primary impact will be a rise in temperature, leading to the Earth potentially becoming molten. This transformation is expected to occur billions of years in the future, following the Sun's hydrogen depletion.
SoumyaBanerjee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
sir,
I am a member of Michio Kakus's organisation.Some days later i have ask this organisation a question about astrophysics and in reply they have told me to send this question in Michio Kaku's forum. As a member of the organisation i would like to ask you a question about astrophysics.If you give me a reply i will be very much obliged.In a serial of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHY they say that, after about 3 billion years the sun will expand and covers almost all the distance between the Earth and sun.As a reult the Earth will turn to magma due to excesive closelyness to sun.Now it is also said that this will happened due to the hydrogen of the sun will turn to helium.Here i found some problem,if the hydrogen of the sun will turn to helium then certainly there is some loss of mass in the sun,because some mass will turn to energy.Now if there is a reduction of mass then the attraction power of the sun will decrease.So the attraction to the Earth will also decrease.So the Earth will be situated in a bigger distance than the preasent and this will happen in same ratio of the reduction of mass.So if the sun covers the distance between sun and earth,then at that time the Earth will be situated in much further distance,and the distance remain almost same and the radiomagnetic wave have to coverthe same distance.So how can they say that the Earth will turn to magma after 3 billion years due to the reduction of distance.It may happen that the Earth will be cooler than the preasent,because the power of the sun will decrease.
Please give the answer of my question.
Yours faithfully
soumya
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Soumya,

what if the sun gets to be only a little bit
less massive, while it becomes much bigger?

The sun operates by converting hydrogen to helium (thermonuclear fusion deep inside it where the temperature and pressure are high enough). But when hydrogen fuses to form helium the decrease in mass is less than one percent

So the sun, in several billion years, will be nearly the same mass,
and have nearly the same gravity as it does today. It will be reduced in mass by less than one percent.
This will not allow the size of the Earth's orbit to change very much.

The big change will be in the temperature and size of the sun, because of running out of the customary hydrogen fuel.
We have seen this happening with other stars that have run out of their hydrogen. They swell up!

What happens is, when there is no more hydrogen in the core of the star for it to fuse, the core contracts until the pressure and temperature conditions are so extreme that it it is able to fuse helium and convert it to carbon

unfortunately once this helium-fusion begins, it happens at a somewhat faster rate than the star can normally accommodate (perhaps this resembles an
attack of indigestion or fit of cholic in one of us) and the star swells up to an abnormal size

Because we have seen the results of this bloating in other stars (like the one in the shoulder of the constellation Orion) we can reasonably expect it to happen to the sun.

But it will not happen until the sun has finished consuming the hydrogen in its core and coverting that hydrogen to helium. Therefore we can expect several billion years of good behavior before this happens.

best wishes

m
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top