Mercury Displacement in a Sealed Tube: Isothermal vs. Adiabatic Processes

  • Thread starter Thread starter zygisyyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury Tube
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the displacement of mercury in a sealed tube when it is turned vertically, considering both isothermal and adiabatic processes. The participant has calculated a displacement of 0.072 m for the isothermal case and is seeking confirmation on the correctness of their approach, which involves using pressure differences and the equation F=p*A. There is a request for clarification on the setup of the tube, specifically regarding the separation of mercury and air. The participant is also inquiring if there is a simpler method to determine the displacement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the assumptions of the processes involved.
zygisyyy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin tube, sealed at both ends, is 1 m long. It lies horizontally, the middle 10 cm containing mercury at the two equal ends containing air at standard atmospheric pressure. If the tube is now turned to a vertical position, by what amount will the mercury be displaced? Assume that the process is (a) isothermal and (b) adiabatic. Which assumption is more reasonable?

Homework Equations



F=p*A

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured maybe I could calculate the displacement by finding the difference between the two pressures ( or vector sum ) and by using F=p*A and other intermediate equations like that of volume find the displacement.
I got 0.072m of displacement in isothermal case. I think the answer can actually be near the logical one, but i still want to make sure whether I'm using the correct approach.
and maybe there is simpler way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zygisyyy said:
It lies horizontally, the middle 10 cm containing mercury at the two equal ends containing air at standard atmospheric pressure.


Can you clarify this please?
 
Tube is thin enough so that mercury closes it, separating air on both sides.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top