Mercury intrusion porosimetry equipment

AI Thread Summary
Mercury intrusion porosimetry is effective for measuring micro and mesoporosity but is inadequate for macroporosity due to the lack of resistance when mercury flows into larger pores, making measurements unreliable beyond approximately 60 micrometers. The maximum pore size reported by this technique is 130 micrometers, but practical measurements are limited to smaller sizes. Pore number fraction refers to the distribution of pore sizes within the material. To calculate total porosity, use the apparent density from porosimetry and the real density from helium pycnometry. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate characterization of porous ceramics.
Msl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have used the Mercury intrusion porosimetry equipment to determine pore diameter range of porous ceramic material. But it only determined the micro and meso porosity. I also read that this tecnique is not adequate to determine macroporosity. Do you know Why?

This equipment also determined pore number fraction. Can you tell me what is this?

How do I calculate the total porosity with knowing the apparent density given by the porosimetry equipment and the real density given by the helium picnometer?

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
pressure range is probably insufficient to cover macropores (I assume you use the standard macro = >0.05um?).
The problem is that at some point the Hg just kinda flows into the pores without resistance. Then, the measurement becomes unreliable. the max. pore size it gives as an output is 130um. Practically,that size can not be measured. I trust it to 60um or so, above that, the measurement intrusion becomes noise over the entire range.

Go here for some more explanations:
http://www.micromeritics.com/Repository/Files/mercury_paper.pdf
 
Last edited:
PS: Here's exactly what you need:
http://www.micromeritics.com/Repository/Files/A_Few_Facts_Pertaining_to_the_Low_Pressure_Performance.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello MSl, was this of use to you?
 
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top