Schools Merging of Schools: STEM Degree Concerns in North Georgia

  • Thread starter Thread starter kickthatbike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The recent merger of Southern Polytechnic State University (SPSU) and Kennesaw State University (KSU) has raised concerns among students regarding the implications for STEM degrees. Students worry that a degree from KSU, known primarily as a liberal arts college, may be perceived negatively compared to SPSU's strong STEM focus. While there are fears about potential changes in faculty, curriculum, and job security for staff, there are also opportunities, such as access to accomplished professors and existing research funding at KSU. The discussion highlights that the value of a STEM degree ultimately depends on individual performance, including GPA, research experience, and extracurricular activities. Students are encouraged to consider their career goals and seek guidance on how the merger may affect their graduation timelines and academic paths. Overall, while concerns exist, the degree's value can still be maintained through strategic planning and personal effort.
kickthatbike
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So we (students) were informed recently of a merging of two schools in north Georgia, SPSU and KSU. SPSU is a science/tech/engineering school, while KSU is... not so much. Everyone is panicking thinking that a STEM degree from what is normally known as a liberal arts college would look bad. Is this a legitimate concern? Or is a STEM degree from most universities just as good, pending good grades, extracurriculars, research, etc. etc. etc.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What changes will there be among your STEM faculty, courses, degree requirements, and research opportunities?
 
I guess there's no good answer to that currently. However, the department chair is quite concerned for his job. The upside would be that there are some quite accomplished physics professors at KSU, as well as some decent science tracks for chem/biochem. And because KSU already has some thesis based graduate programs for these departments, they obviously have some funding/research. It's possible that they could take the physics department and do something similar, which would be excellent. The downside is a possible change of curriculum, some of the current staff losing their jobs, they could possibly decide to do nothing at all with the physics program or drop it, and KSU has a somewhat lower standard of academic performance in the STEM subjects. But if nothing really changes, outside of more funding and the school changing their name, would a STEM degree coming from a liberal arts college really be as bad as everyone's making it out to be?
 
For the most part, a STEM degree from a liberal arts college wouldn't look quite nice. The fact remains that since the schools are merging, the information taught won't differ by much. I wouldn't worry about it too much (unless I had options to go to more reputed universities). You can make up for it by doing research, publications, a good GPA etc. However, if the way they taught the material will change after the merging, then I would consider some other college/university.
 
kickthatbike said:
So we (students) were informed recently of a merging of two schools in north Georgia, SPSU and KSU. SPSU is a science/tech/engineering school, while KSU is... not so much. Everyone is panicking thinking that a STEM degree from what is normally known as a liberal arts college would look bad. Is this a legitimate concern? Or is a STEM degree from most universities just as good, pending good grades, extracurriculars, research, etc. etc. etc.?

Without more information, it's impossible to say how this will affect you. Where are you in terms of graduation, and what is the merger timeline? You are right to be concerned with how a major institutional change will impact your career and there should be some sort of 'student liaison', possibly in the advising office, that can answer questions like: "will I still be able to graduate on time?"

In terms of the 'value' of your degree, ultimately it's your responsibility to create value. This can be done by thinking strategically- what do you want to do next, and how does your undergraduate experience qualify you for that?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top