Merry-Go-Round physics homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a merry-go-round with a specified radius and mass, which is initially set in motion with constant angular acceleration. The first part requires calculating the final rotational kinetic energy, which was found to be approximately 987 J. In the second part, when five children step onto the merry-go-round, the angular velocity decreases, and the initial poster initially miscalculated this value. The conversation highlights the importance of conservation of angular momentum over kinetic energy, noting that while angular momentum remains constant, kinetic energy is not conserved due to external forces acting on the system. The correct approach to solving the problem was confirmed through the application of these principles.
bpw91284
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A merry-go-round in a playground has a radius of about 2 m and a mass of about 400 kg. Starting from rest, a parent begins to rotate it with constant angular acceleration. After 5 s, it reaches its final angular velocity of about pi/2 rad/s, and continues to rotate at that angular velocity

a.
Treat the merry-go-round as a uniform disk (the moment of inertia of a uniform disk is mr2/2); the final rotational kinetic energy of the merry-go-round is about ___ J.

b.
5 children, each with a mass of about 20 kg, step on the merry-go-round and stay near its edge. As they step on it, its angular velocity drops to about ____ rad/s. Ignore friction.



Homework Equations



I_disk=0.5mr^2
KE_rotational=0.5*I*w^2


The Attempt at a Solution



For part a I did...

KE=(0.5)(0.5)(400)(2^2)(pi/2)^2=987 J

For part b I did...

KE_i=KE_f

987 = 0.5(100)(2^2)(w^2) + 0.5(0.5)(400)(2^2)(w^2)

and get w=1.3 but the answer is supposed to be 1.0. Is mr^2 the correct way to do the kid's intertia?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that kinetic energy will remain the same?

What physical quantity you are sure that will remain constant? Maybe angular momentum, who knows!?
 
Yes, think about what gyro is stating.
Also, your KE eqn is incorrect, there should be an omega squared. You seemed to take this into account in your soln. though.*edit* it is fixed now
 
Last edited:
Used conservation of angular momentum and got the correct answer. Though, why is KE not conserved?

Thanks,
Brandon
 
When the kids jump to the merry-go-round they exert forces on it. Forces cause change in kinetic energy, do not they?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top