Mesons other than quark-antiquark states?

  • Thread starter Thread starter websterling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mesons States
websterling
Messages
156
Reaction score
131
Mesons: hadrons with integer spin, usually quark-antiquark states

I came across this statement in a pdf of a powerpoint. Unfortunately the presentation is so badly formatted (missing images, content overlapping content, etc.) that it's hard to follow and I can't see if he ever describes mesons that are not quark-antiquark states.

Are there mesons that aren't quark-antiquark pairs? The only definition I've ever seen is: Mesons are hadronic subatomic particles composed of one quark and one antiquark, bound together by the strong interaction. The only thing I can think of is that he might classify tetraquarks as mesons because of their integer spin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the definition.

There are exotic states that could be tetraquarks, meson molecules or something else (and it's not clear if it makes sense to distinguish between those categories). The existence of something meson-like is clear, the interpretation is not.

Hypothetical glueballs could be called mesons as well.
 
  • Like
Likes websterling
websterling said:
Are there mesons that aren't quark-antiquark pairs? The only definition I've ever seen is: Mesons are hadronic subatomic particles composed of one quark and one antiquark, bound together by the strong interaction. The only thing I can think of is that he might classify tetraquarks as mesons because of their integer spin?

Your definition can't really be true, since many mesons are linear combinations of multiple quark-antiquark states, most prosaically, neutral pions, but also for several other light pseudo-scalar mesons. This is also the case for essentially all true scalar mesons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top