Metal Detector Thwarter: An Engineering Perspective on Foiling Security Systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter SELFMADE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detector Metal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a device that could potentially deceive metal detectors by transmitting signals between the detector's transmitter and receiver. The idea involves creating a small box that could be concealed on a person to manipulate the detection process. However, concerns are raised about the feasibility of such a device, particularly regarding the lag time in signal processing, which may render the concept impractical. The conversation is ultimately shut down due to the forum's policy against discussing illegal activities. The focus remains strictly on the engineering implications of the proposed device.
SELFMADE
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I am first year EE student so forgive me if there is huge lack of knowledge. While reading ahead in my physics book I found out that metal detectors in airports, courts etc are basically transmitters and receivers. If metal gets in between the detector sets off the alarm.

What if then, there is a small box with one wall that can receive the signal and other that can transmit it to the detector's receiver? One which a perpetrator can strap on inside of his thigh for example.

Theoretically, this thwarter box can fool the detector is it?

I imagine the electricmagnetic field between the detector is almost instanteneous, meaning if any metal gets in between alarm is set off instanteneously. I further imagine that there will be lag time in the thwarther box to process the signal and transmit it. So does it make the idea unworkable from the inception?

Please no talk about how IMMORAL this thwarter box is. Talk only from engineering prespective please

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
SELFMADE said:
Please no talk about how IMMORAL this thwarter box is. Talk only from engineering prespective please

thanks
Sorry, we don't allow discussion of illegal activities, theoretical or not. Thread locked.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top