Metal Detectors: The Depths of the Ground

  • Thread starter Thread starter nanoswift
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detectors Metal
AI Thread Summary
Metal detecting enthusiasts discuss the limitations of current metal detectors, particularly their tendency to pick up iron and their depth capabilities. An undergraduate from Lancaster University seeks innovative methods to improve metal detection technology, specifically through Solid State Physics. Ground-penetrating radar and conductivity measurements are suggested as alternative methods for subsurface exploration, with mixed reviews on their effectiveness. The conversation highlights the challenges in developing new detection technologies and the reluctance of individuals to share innovative ideas. Overall, the quest for better metal detection solutions continues amidst existing technological constraints.
nanoswift
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Metal Detectors!

Guys I an Undergraduate student in Lancaster University (England) and I have a passion for metal detecting when I am not in UNI. Over the years I have spoke many of my lecturers and research staff about the depth of a metal detector and its soul destroying ability to pick up iron. Now so far I have been told that there is no other way of looking into the ground other than these
http://metaldetectingworld.com/reviews_pulse_metal_detector.shtml
http://whitesmetaldetector.com/spectrum.shtml

Believe me I am not ready to believe that there is no other way. Please if someone has a bright idea of how to make a new one using Solid State Physics or any other method, then please let me know! Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


nanoswift said:
Guys I an Undergraduate student in Lancaster University (England) and I have a passion for metal detecting when I am not in UNI. Over the years I have spoke many of my lecturers and research staff about the depth of a metal detector and its soul destroying ability to pick up iron. Now so far I have been told that there is no other way of looking into the ground other than these
http://metaldetectingworld.com/reviews_pulse_metal_detector.shtml
http://whitesmetaldetector.com/spectrum.shtml

Believe me I am not ready to believe that there is no other way. Please if someone has a bright idea of how to make a new one using Solid State Physics or any other method, then please let me know! Thanks

My guess is that if anybody did have a bright new idea they would be looking into developing it and most reluctant to just give the idea away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


There are other ways at looking into the ground. Ground-penetrating-radar is used fo ra lot of stuff, and increasingly popular among archaeologists.
 


Throw in conductivity measurements.
 


Try googling archeological geophysics.
 


Conductivity is what the MineLab company use, they are really good detectors but not very deep. The radar machine that the archaeologists use is not very effective because I knew one guy who spend £9500 to get one and it was rubbish and he couldn't even get his refund! So any other ideas?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top