Metal sphere and electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field between a metal sphere and its surrounding conducting shell. It emphasizes the need to use a Gaussian surface to analyze the electric field in this region. The total charge of the system is specified as 4 microCoulombs, with 1 microCoulomb on the inner sphere and the remainder on the shell. It is clarified that the electric field inside the conductor is zero, leading to a conclusion that the inner surface of the shell must have a charge of -4 microCoulombs to balance the positive charge of the sphere. Consequently, the outer surface of the conductor is determined to have no charge.
cherrios
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This problem is somewhat similar to the one I had posted yesterday.

There is a metal spehre, radius=x, that it surrounded by a conducting shell (also spherical) that has an inner radius=y and outer radius=Z

1)Find electric field between the outer surface of the metal sphere and the inner radius of the conducting shell.

Would I need to take a Gaussian surface between the outer surface of the metal sphere and inner radius of the conducting shell? And also, how would I find the surface charge density on the inner and outer surfaces of the conducting shell?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cherrios said:
This problem is somewhat similar to the one I had posted yesterday.

There is a metal spehre, radius=x, that it surrounded by a conducting shell (also spherical) that has an inner radius=y and outer radius=Z

1)Find electric field between the outer surface of the metal sphere and the inner radius of the conducting shell.

Would I need to take a Gaussian surface between the outer surface of the metal sphere and inner radius of the conducting shell? And also, how would I find the surface charge density on the inner and outer surfaces of the conducting shell?

We need to know where the charge is in the system.

Two tips in general about conductors: The electric field inside a conductor is zero. There are no charges inside of a conductor, they all migrate to the surfaces.

-Dan
 
Sorry, the total charge is 4 micro Coloumbs--> 1 micro Coloumb on the inner sphere, and the rest is distributed in the shell
 
cherrios said:
Sorry, the total charge is 4 micro Coloumbs--> 1 micro Coloumb on the inner sphere, and the rest is distributed in the shell

Okay, so inside the conductor, what is the electric field? (Zero by definition!) What does Gauss' Law tell you about the amount of charge inside your Gaussian surface? Since the conductor was initially neutral (I'm assuming) what does that mean for the outer surface of the conductor?

-Dan
 
I think that the outer surface would probably have no charge then?
 
cherrios said:
I think that the outer surface would probably have no charge then?

Okay, the metal sphere has a charge of 4 microCoulomb on it (positive I'm assuming). So, you want the charge on the surfaces of the spherical conductor surrounding it.

Consider a Gaussian surface inside your conductor. Since the electric field inside a conductor is zero, Gauss' Law predicts that the total charge inside the Gaussian surface is zero. But we know that +4 microCoulomb are on the metal sphere, so the only way this can happen is if -4 microCoulomb is in the conductor volume of your Gaussian surface. But free charges don't stay inside conductors...they flow to the surfaces. So you now know that there is -4 microCoulomb of charge on the inside surface of the conductor. This charge will be spread evenly over the surface area.

So if your initially neutral conductor has -4 microCoulomb on its inner surface, what is the charge on the outer surface?

-Dan
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top