Meteoritical History of the Solar System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a chronological timeline of solid formation in the solar system, detailing key events and corresponding meteorite examples. It outlines the condensation of the first solids, the formation of chondrules and minor planets, and the impact of collisions leading to primitive achondrites. The timeline progresses through the differentiation of large asteroids, accretion into planetesimals, and the formation of rocky planets and their satellites. A clarification is sought on the correctness of the order presented, with a note on the Shergottite Age Paradox highlighting the complexities in understanding Mars's geological history. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consulting professional literature for accurate timelines and potential controversies.
connorp
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to create a chronological timeline of the formation of solids in the solar system with examples of meteorites for each step. Let me know if this order looks right.

First solids condense in the solar nebula (Calcium aluminum inclusions in carbonaceous chrondrites).

Chondrules rapidly form and begin to gravitational attract each other, forming the first minor planets (petrological type 3 chondrites).

Collisions of minor planets became more frequent as more formed and they got larger. Primitive achondrites were formed as a results of increased internal heating (due to larger bodies) and external heating from collisions.

Large asteroids become geologically differentiated (iron meteorites).

Asteroids accrete to form planetesimals (HED achondrites from 4 Vesta).

Rocky planets begin to form (shergottites and some Earth rock).

Planetary satellites are formed or captured (lunar breccia).

Does this look correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
Not really. All I really need clarification on is if the order is correct. Those are the only major events possible to include and the example specimens are definitely correct for each step. So just whether the order is right, which I suspect it is.
 
I think that you might want to list whatever sources that you are using. Review articles in the professional literature are often a good place to look. You may find various controversies about the ages of various objects. That's a natural part of cutting-edge research, and you ought to note that.

As to shergottites, they are not primordial. In fact, there is something called the Shergottite Age Paradox. Shergottites are about 180 million years old, but most of Mars's geological activity is much older than that. Are we lucky in getting lots of fragments from an impact event on some young rock?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top