Method of Image Charges - Range of validity of solutions

AI Thread Summary
The method of image charges provides valid solutions for electrostatic problems only within the volume containing the real charge. For cases like a point charge above an infinite plane, the electric field is accurately described on the same side as the charge, while the opposite side can be approached by modeling the space as filled with an ideal conductor, leading to evenly distributed surface charge. In scenarios involving parallel grounded plates, the potential diverges outside the defined range, indicating that the solution is not valid beyond those limits. To find the electric field outside the valid region, one can utilize the properties of equipotential surfaces and symmetry. Understanding these constraints is crucial for applying the method effectively in electrostatics.
RoyalCat
Messages
670
Reaction score
2
When using the method of image charges to solve a problem in electrostatics, how do we determine the volume of space in which our solution is valid? And how do we find the solution outside this volume?
To be more specific, let's consider two examples.

The first is the classic point charge above an infinite plane sheet of charge. The text-book solution is the field of an electric dipole symmetric about the plane of the sheet of charge, with the solution valid on the side of the plate that the charge is on. What is the electric field on the side opposite that of the point charge, and is there an easier way to find it other than integrating over the surface charge density found using the image charge?

The second is a variation on the question posted here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=426237

The variation consists of two parallel grounded plates, (x=0 is the position of the left plate, x=L is the position of the right plate), with a point charge, q, at a distance d from the left plate, along the x axis.

The potential along the x-axis is given by the infinite sum:

V(x) = kq \sum ^{\infty} _{n=-\infty}(\frac{1}{|x-(2nL+d)|}-\frac{1}{|x-(2nL-d)|})

Graphing this expression for x, we find that it diverges for x near d, as expected, 0 at x=0 and x=L, as expected, but it is obviously not valid outside the range 0<x<L since it diverges for x near -d.
And the same question can be asked here as was asked for the single sheet of charge.

With thanks in advance, Anatoli.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field obtained with the method of image charges is valid in that volume of the space where the real charge is positioned. As for the field in the space at the other side: I think - I might be wrong- you can get it by assuming that the volume enclosed by the equipotential surface and containing the real charge is filled with an ideal metal: The outer surface charge is evenly distributed.

See the following link which illustrates the method for a problem similar to the thread with two parallel plates.

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com
/MethodOfImageChargesPointChargeInsideAPlanarCapacitor/

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top